• 

  ‘’STIMULATES MIND. ENERGIZES BODY’’ Tagline is not deceptively similar to ‘’VITALIZES BODY AND MIND’’. Delhi High Court refuses interim injunction to Red Bull AG against PepsiCo India.

  • 09-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When a compromise is filed before the Court, only that Court must record the compromise. The matter cannot be referred to the Lok- Adalat. Karnataka High Court.

  • 08-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Even if the goods are not produced or sold in India, plaintiff can establish reputation in India and seek an order of injunction against infringement of its registered trademark. Delhi High Court.

  • 08-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Son-in-law cannot claim right over property of his father-in-law. Claim of being adopted as member of in-laws family is shameful. Kerala High Court.

  • 08-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Merely because charge sheet did not accompany FSL report, accused cannot contend that he is entitled for bail especially when Police report with necessary details is filed within time. Karnataka High Court.

  • 07-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  ''Vajpayee led NDA–Government was toppled for want of one vote.'' Election set aside by a very small margin is not a ground to set aside judgement in election petition. Karnataka High Court.

  • 07-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Affiliation of Colleges. Exercise of power must not only satisfy integrity and probity but also the timeframe within which power is exercised. Karnataka High Court.

  • 07-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Omission to put question to accused under section 313 Cr.P.C, cannot be a good ground to upset conviction unless it has resulted in miscarriage of justice or prejudiced the interest of the accused substantially. Karnataka High Court.

  • 06-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  There is no bar for the informant police officer to undertake investigation so long as the investigation is free of bias and prejudice. Karnataka High Court.

  • 06-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  ‘’No limitation to doing justice.’’ State cannot shield itself behind the ground of delay and laches when relief is sought against forcible dispossession of a person of his private property without following due process of law. Supreme Court.

  • 06-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Whether corporate death of an entity upon amalgamation per se invalidates an assessment order cannot be determined on a bare application of the provisions in the Companies Act but would depend on the terms of the amalgamation. Supreme Court.

  • 06-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Preemption under the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955. Non-notified co-sharer is entitled to bring a petition for preemption within a period of three years from the date of registration of the impugned document of sale. Calcutta High Court.

  • 05-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal