• 

  Call received on Police helpline disclosing cognizable offence shall also be considered as information for registering FIR. Karnataka High Court.

  • 24-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Gyanvapi dispute. Shivaling area shall continue to be protected until further orders of the District Court in the suit. Supreme Court.

  • 20-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Electricity companies must insure power lines and equipments against any act of nature and claims arising out of electrocution of persons or destruction of crops. Karnataka High Court.

  • 21-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Navjot Singh Sidhu case - Undue sympathy to impose inadequate sentence would do more harm to justice system and undermine the public confidence in the efficacy of law driving the injured to resort to private vengeance. Supreme Court.

  • 19-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When ex­parte decree is set aside and the suit is restored to file, right to file written statement cannot be automatically foreclosed without specific order of the Court in this regard. Supreme Court.

  • 19-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Hindu widow in possession of property of her husband or HUF has a right to be in possession and to be maintained out of the said property which right gets automatically enlarged into absolute right after Hindu Succession Act. Supreme Court reiterates.

  • 19-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Conducting arbitration proceedings at new place owing to appointment of a new arbitrator would not shift the ‘jurisdictional seat of arbitration’. Supreme Court.

  • 21-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Doctrine of delay and laches does not apply to cases of continuing cause of action like claiming arrears of salary since cause of action arises every month when salary is paid on wrong computation. Supreme Court.

  • 21-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Sections 14 and 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act does not oust the High Court’s jurisdiction under Article 226 & 227 as the same is a part of the basic structure of the Constitution. Supreme Court.

  • 21-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When a composite suit is filed for cancellation of sale deed and recovery of possession, limitation period is to be considered with respect to the substantive relief of cancellation of the sale deed, which would be three years. Supreme Court.

  • 22-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When a person denies execution of a document and registration is refused by the Sub-Registrar on that ground, the said order is not appealable under Section 72 of the Registration Act. Supreme Court.

  • 19-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Mere admission of signature on a document does not amount to execution of the document. Where a person admits his signature on a document but denies its execution, the Sub-Registrar should refuse registration. Supreme Court.

  • 19-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal