Log In
Sign Up
9980065416
Toggle navigation
HOME
BARE ACTS
JUDGMENTS
ARTICLES
NEWS
SEMINARS
LAWYERS DIRECTORY
Courts
ಕನ್ನಡ
Search
Sign Up
Karnataka Stamp Act. While determining the market value of a leased property, registration authorities cannot rely solely on the guidance value. They are required to consider any restrictive clauses in the lease such as limitations on use, transfer, or enjoyment which may diminish the property’s value in comparison to an unencumbered freehold property. Karnataka High Court.
27-March-2026
Daksha Legal
Judgement
Payment of Gratuity Act is a special, self-contained code. The Appellate Authority has no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal or condone delay once a total period of 120 days from the date of receipt of the order has expired, and it has no power to extend this period further. Karnataka High Court.
27-March-2026
Daksha Legal
Judgement
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
21-September-2025
Daksha Legal
Article
News
10-March-2026
Trump’s Tariff Trumped: An analysis of the Judgment of the Scotus
06-March-2026
One Twenty Days deadline to file Written Statement. Constitutional validity of Section 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Karnataka Amendment) Act, 2024 challenged before the Karnataka High Court.
26-January-2026
KSBC Chairman urges the Chief Justice of India to expedite the filling of vacancies in the Karnataka High Court.
26-January-2026
Daksha Legal - Five years of relentless and persistent hard work. Gurudas Kannur. Senior Advocate.
Civil Procedure Code. Section 24. A transfer application falls within the ambit of ‘other proceedings,’ and an order passed on such an application constitutes a ‘case decided,’ as it finally disposes of the matter before the District Judge. Consequently, a Civil Revision Petition is maintainable against such an order. Karnataka High Court.
27-March-2026
Daksha Legal
Judgement
Service Law. When the State Government provides an explicit assurance through official correspondence that candidates securing a minimum qualifying mark in a selection process will be appointed, such candidates acquire a 'Legitimate Expectation' of appointment. The State cannot subsequently deny these appointments by citing the abolition of the cadre or changes in recruitment rules. Karnataka High Court.
27-March-2026
Daksha Legal
Judgement
Land Acquisition Act. Section 28A is a benevolent provision designed to ensure 'parity in compensation'. A landowner is not prohibited from filing a second application for re-determination of compensation if a higher amount is subsequently awarded, even if he has already benefited from an earlier re-determination based on a lower Reference Court award. Supreme Court.
27-March-2026
Daksha Legal
Judgement
Suicide of a minor following consumption of liquor: A licensee is not only prohibited from serving alcohol to minors but is also under a duty to ensure that minors are not allowed to remain on premises where intoxicants are sold or manufactured. Karnataka High Court rejects plea of Brewing Company partner challenging criminal prosecution.
25-March-2026
Daksha Legal
Judgement
A writ of mandamus for the payment of compensation for improvements on acquired land cannot be issued in the absence of clear, contemporaneous documentary evidence proving that such structures existed prior to the issuance of the preliminary notification. To succeed in such a claim, the petitioner must establish a 'legally enforceable right' based on verified records rather than bare assertions. Karnataka High Court.
26-March-2026
Daksha Legal
Judgement
A party cannot be held 'jointly and severally' liable for a monetary claim in the absence of any oral or documentary evidence linking that party to the transaction. An admission by the plaintiff during cross-examination that a particular defendant was not involved in the deal or the receipt of funds is fatal to the claim against that individual. Karnataka High Court.
26-March-2026
Daksha Legal
Judgement
Daksha Legal Seminars
Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act
03-October-2021 22:43
Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court
15-July-2021 03:42
Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code
15-July-2021 03:40
Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court
15-July-2021 03:37
Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)
30-May-2021 17:55
Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021
30-May-2021 04:27
Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.
09-December-2020 06:19
Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore
09-December-2020 06:20
Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar
09-December-2020 06:18
Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah
09-December-2020 06:18
Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda
09-December-2020 06:18
Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda
09-December-2020 06:18
Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court
09-December-2020 06:18
Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020
09-December-2020 06:18
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
09-December-2020 06:18
Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate
09-December-2020 06:18
Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.
09-December-2020 06:18
Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"
25-November-2020 06:12
Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.
25-November-2020 06:12
Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate
25-November-2020 06:12
Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.
25-November-2020 06:11
Client Reviews
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
07-November-2024
Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
08-October-2024
Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
03-October-2024
Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
01-October-2024
Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
30-September-2024
Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
28-September-2024
Daksha Legal
Article