‘’Public transport must remain a place of safety and dignity, not one of silent fear and exploitation.’’ Karnataka High Court declines to quash criminal proceedings against the accused for posting obscene images of women on the Instagram account “Metro Chicks.”
‘’Public transport must remain a place of safety and dignity, not one of silent fear and exploitation.’’ Karnataka High Court declines to quash criminal proceedings against the accused for posting obscene images of women on the Instagram account “Metro Chicks.”
  • 29-April-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
SARFAESI Act. Secured creditor Bank is duty bound to deliver possession of the property to the auction purchaser, if physical possession has not been delivered pursuant to the auction purchase. The Bank can initiate proceedings under Section 14 even after the sale deed is executed. Karnataka High Court.
SARFAESI Act. Secured creditor Bank is duty bound to deliver possession of the property to the auction purchaser, if physical possession has not been delivered pursuant to the auction purchase. The Bank can initiate proceedings under Section 14 even after the sale deed is executed. Karnataka High Court.
  • 29-April-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
  • 21-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
Cause of action for the purpose of Writ jurisdiction is to be construed liberally and pragmatically, and where a chain of events forms a continuous transaction spanning multiple States, each component constitutes a material part of the cause of action. Karnataka High Court.
Cause of action for the purpose of Writ jurisdiction is to be construed liberally and pragmatically, and where a chain of events forms a continuous transaction spanning multiple States, each component constitutes a material part of the cause of action. Karnataka High Court.
  • 29-April-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Government officers of a State are duty-bound to implement orders passed by a High Court of another State, as Article 226(2) confers wide territorial jurisdiction on High Courts wherever any part of the cause of action arises, which is to be construed liberally across interconnected events. Karnataka High Court.
Government officers of a State are duty-bound to implement orders passed by a High Court of another State, as Article 226(2) confers wide territorial jurisdiction on High Courts wherever any part of the cause of action arises, which is to be construed liberally across interconnected events. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-April-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Prevention of Corruption Act. Exoneration of a public servant in a departmental proceeding cannot constitute a foundation for refusal of approval under Section 17A. Karnataka High Court.
Prevention of Corruption Act. Exoneration of a public servant in a departmental proceeding cannot constitute a foundation for refusal of approval under Section 17A. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-April-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Karnataka Forest Act. Sanction of the appropriate authority under Section 114-A of the Act is not necessary before initiating a civil suit seeking for declaratory reliefs and/or compensation as regards a land claimed to be the private property. Karnataka High Court.
Karnataka Forest Act. Sanction of the appropriate authority under Section 114-A of the Act is not necessary before initiating a civil suit seeking for declaratory reliefs and/or compensation as regards a land claimed to be the private property. Karnataka High Court.
  • 27-April-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
The Courts and Tribunals have inherent power to recall their own orders or judgments if those orders were obtained by fraud, even when statutory review is not available or has been exhausted in the earlier round of litigation. Karnataka High Court.
The Courts and Tribunals have inherent power to recall their own orders or judgments if those orders were obtained by fraud, even when statutory review is not available or has been exhausted in the earlier round of litigation. Karnataka High Court.
  • 27-April-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Manufacture, distribution, sale and possession of intoxicants are a privilege of a State. Even in the absence of any legislation, the decision to grant licences and privileges would be a matter of policy governed under Article 162 of the Constitution.
Manufacture, distribution, sale and possession of intoxicants are a privilege of a State. Even in the absence of any legislation, the decision to grant licences and privileges would be a matter of policy governed under Article 162 of the Constitution.
  • 28-April-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11

Client Reviews

Client Review 1
Client Review 2
Client Review 3
Client Review 4
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article