Where a Civil Court cancels or declares void a registered instrument relating to immovable property, it shall direct transmission of the decree to the jurisdictional Sub-Registrar, who must make necessary entries in the relevant registers. Even in the absence of communication from the Court, the Sub-Registrar is bound to give effect to the decree upon production of a certified copy of the judgment and decree by a party. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 1657
Where a Civil Court cancels or declares void a registered instrument relating to immovable property, it shall direct transmission of the decree to the jurisdictional Sub-Registrar, who must make necessary entries in the relevant registers. Even in the absence of communication from the Court, the Sub-Registrar is bound to give effect to the decree upon production of a certified copy of the judgment and decree by a party. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 1657
  • 04-November-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act. A person who is not a ‘relative’ as defined under Section 2(g) cannot challenge a gift executed by the owner. A sale transaction effected pursuant to an illegal order of the Assistant Commissioner can be declared void in a writ petition, with a consequential direction to restore the revenue entries. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 1662
Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act. A person who is not a ‘relative’ as defined under Section 2(g) cannot challenge a gift executed by the owner. A sale transaction effected pursuant to an illegal order of the Assistant Commissioner can be declared void in a writ petition, with a consequential direction to restore the revenue entries. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 1662
  • 05-November-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Why is a regime-change revolution difficult in India?
Why is a regime-change revolution difficult in India?
  • 21-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
Strictures against Judicial Officers. Inadvertent clerical or typographical errors that do not affect the outcome of a case should not automatically invite strictures against a judicial officer. Adverse remarks against a judicial officer cannot be recorded without providing an opportunity of hearing, as doing so violates the principles of natural justice. Supreme Court.
Strictures against Judicial Officers. Inadvertent clerical or typographical errors that do not affect the outcome of a case should not automatically invite strictures against a judicial officer. Adverse remarks against a judicial officer cannot be recorded without providing an opportunity of hearing, as doing so violates the principles of natural justice. Supreme Court.
  • 04-November-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Bigamy. A foreign divorce decree granted on a ground not recognised under Indian matrimonial law cannot be relied upon to evade prosecution for bigamy when the first marriage continues to subsist, even if the second marriage was solemnised outside India. Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 855
Bigamy. A foreign divorce decree granted on a ground not recognised under Indian matrimonial law cannot be relied upon to evade prosecution for bigamy when the first marriage continues to subsist, even if the second marriage was solemnised outside India. Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 855
  • 04-November-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Personal Liberty. The mandatory 24-hour period for producing a detained person before a Magistrate under Article 22(2) of the Constitution and Section 58 of the BNSS commences from the actual moment of restraint and deprivation of personal liberty, not from the formal time of arrest recorded by the police. Violation renders the detention illegal. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 1665
Personal Liberty. The mandatory 24-hour period for producing a detained person before a Magistrate under Article 22(2) of the Constitution and Section 58 of the BNSS commences from the actual moment of restraint and deprivation of personal liberty, not from the formal time of arrest recorded by the police. Violation renders the detention illegal. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 1665
  • 05-November-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Entering a mosque and shouting the slogan ‘’Jai Shri Ram’’ does not, by itself, constitute the offence of ‘’deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs’’ under Section 295-A of the Indian Penal Code. Karnataka High Court.
Entering a mosque and shouting the slogan ‘’Jai Shri Ram’’ does not, by itself, constitute the offence of ‘’deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs’’ under Section 295-A of the Indian Penal Code. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-November-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Transfer of Property Act. A registered mortgage created over an immovable property takes legal precedence over any subsequent sale or transfer, and subsequent purchasers who acquire the property with constructive notice of the prior registered mortgage are fully bound by it. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 1638.
Transfer of Property Act. A registered mortgage created over an immovable property takes legal precedence over any subsequent sale or transfer, and subsequent purchasers who acquire the property with constructive notice of the prior registered mortgage are fully bound by it. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 1638.
  • 04-November-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Writ Jurisdiction. The High Court, in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, can cancel the registration of a document that is void ab initio, such as a unilateral cancellation of an earlier sale deed, registered by the Sub-Registrar. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 1620
Writ Jurisdiction. The High Court, in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, can cancel the registration of a document that is void ab initio, such as a unilateral cancellation of an earlier sale deed, registered by the Sub-Registrar. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 1620
  • 04-November-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11

Client Reviews

Client Review 1
Client Review 2
Client Review 3
Client Review 4
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
  • 21-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Article
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article