National Education Policy. ''Formulate comprehensive policy for the effective implementation of the constitutional mandate relating to mother tongue-based education''. Supreme Court directs the State of Rajasthan..
National Education Policy. ''Formulate comprehensive policy for the effective implementation of the constitutional mandate relating to mother tongue-based education''. Supreme Court directs the State of Rajasthan..
  • 15-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Negotiable Instruments Act. Where a single transaction gives rise to multiple cheques and multiple complaints, the Court cannot impose separate default sentences in each case.Imprisonment in default under Section 138 is a regulatory and coercive mechanism to compel monetary compliance, not a substantive criminal punishment. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Where a single transaction gives rise to multiple cheques and multiple complaints, the Court cannot impose separate default sentences in each case.Imprisonment in default under Section 138 is a regulatory and coercive mechanism to compel monetary compliance, not a substantive criminal punishment. Karnataka High Court.
  • 16-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
  • 21-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
Appreciation of evidence. Title of a document is immaterial. The Courts must examine the contents and the intention of the parties which can be gathered from the circumstances under which document was entered and the language used by the parties. Karnataka High Court.
Appreciation of evidence. Title of a document is immaterial. The Courts must examine the contents and the intention of the parties which can be gathered from the circumstances under which document was entered and the language used by the parties. Karnataka High Court.
  • 16-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
An executing court has jurisdiction to re-determine or vary the shares of the parties in a manner contrary to the shares declared and crystallized under the preliminary decree if a subsequent event or a legislative amendment affecting the parties’ entitlement intervenes after the decree. Karnataka High Court.
An executing court has jurisdiction to re-determine or vary the shares of the parties in a manner contrary to the shares declared and crystallized under the preliminary decree if a subsequent event or a legislative amendment affecting the parties’ entitlement intervenes after the decree. Karnataka High Court.
  • 16-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Constructive Resjudicata. The principle applies with equal force in cases where the ground that might and ought to have been raised was not done, even if it is on account of negligence, inadvertence or accident. Supreme Court
Constructive Resjudicata. The principle applies with equal force in cases where the ground that might and ought to have been raised was not done, even if it is on account of negligence, inadvertence or accident. Supreme Court
  • 15-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
In child custody and visitation disputes involving allegations of child sexual abuse, the child’s welfare, dignity, and psychological safety are paramount. Courts must avoid unnecessary psychological evaluations that may re-traumatise the child. Supreme Court.
In child custody and visitation disputes involving allegations of child sexual abuse, the child’s welfare, dignity, and psychological safety are paramount. Courts must avoid unnecessary psychological evaluations that may re-traumatise the child. Supreme Court.
  • 12-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
A decree attached to a property enures to the benefit of the purchaser of that property. A decree directing the BBMP to allot an alternate site can be executed by the purchaser of the site. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 238-247
A decree attached to a property enures to the benefit of the purchaser of that property. A decree directing the BBMP to allot an alternate site can be executed by the purchaser of the site. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 238-247
  • 13-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Compassionate Appointment. The State cannot refuse or defer a claim unless such action is supported by a specific provision of the applicable rules that is relevant to the relief sought. Any such decision must also satisfy the constitutional mandate of non-arbitrariness under Article 14 of the Constitution. Supreme Court.
Compassionate Appointment. The State cannot refuse or defer a claim unless such action is supported by a specific provision of the applicable rules that is relevant to the relief sought. Any such decision must also satisfy the constitutional mandate of non-arbitrariness under Article 14 of the Constitution. Supreme Court.
  • 12-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11

Client Reviews

Client Review 1
Client Review 2
Client Review 3
Client Review 4
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article