Service Law. An employee who is denied fair consideration for promotion due to the non-communication of ACRs and the destruction of service records is entitled to notional promotion and consequential pensionary benefits. The principle of ‘’no work, no pay’’ cannot be applied in such cases. Supreme Court.
Service Law. An employee who is denied fair consideration for promotion due to the non-communication of ACRs and the destruction of service records is entitled to notional promotion and consequential pensionary benefits. The principle of ‘’no work, no pay’’ cannot be applied in such cases. Supreme Court.
  • 19-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. Section 173(3). While a citizen is legally obligated to appear and cooperate with a statutory pre-FIR preliminary inquiry, the police cannot resort to any coercive measures against the summoned individual unless and until a formal opinion is recorded that the collected material discloses a cognizable offence requiring an FIR. Karnataka High Court.
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. Section 173(3). While a citizen is legally obligated to appear and cooperate with a statutory pre-FIR preliminary inquiry, the police cannot resort to any coercive measures against the summoned individual unless and until a formal opinion is recorded that the collected material discloses a cognizable offence requiring an FIR. Karnataka High Court.
  • 19-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
  • 21-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
Motor Vehicles Act. Mere filing of a police charge sheet against a driver is insufficient to automatically prove the occurrence of an accident or the involvement of a specific vehicle. Tribunals are constituted not only to allow the claim petitions which are genuine in nature but at the same time the great responsibility on the part of the claims Tribunal to ensure that no false claims are allowed. Karnataka High Court.
Motor Vehicles Act. Mere filing of a police charge sheet against a driver is insufficient to automatically prove the occurrence of an accident or the involvement of a specific vehicle. Tribunals are constituted not only to allow the claim petitions which are genuine in nature but at the same time the great responsibility on the part of the claims Tribunal to ensure that no false claims are allowed. Karnataka High Court.
  • 19-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Personal Liberty. Where an ECIR under the PMLA is stayed by a competent Court due to the closure or non-survival of the underlying predicate offense, the Enforcement Directorate cannot circumvent or overreach that judicial stay by using materials collected during the stayed investigation to trigger an immediate arrest under a newly registered ECIR based on subsequent, identical nature FIRs. Karnataka High Court.
Personal Liberty. Where an ECIR under the PMLA is stayed by a competent Court due to the closure or non-survival of the underlying predicate offense, the Enforcement Directorate cannot circumvent or overreach that judicial stay by using materials collected during the stayed investigation to trigger an immediate arrest under a newly registered ECIR based on subsequent, identical nature FIRs. Karnataka High Court.
  • 19-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Hindu Law. When a Mitakshara Hindu father partitions his self-acquired property among his sons, the shares allotted to the sons become their separate and absolute properties. Such property does not acquire the character of ancestral or coparcenary property in the hands of the sons with reference to their own children. Karnataka High Court.
Hindu Law. When a Mitakshara Hindu father partitions his self-acquired property among his sons, the shares allotted to the sons become their separate and absolute properties. Such property does not acquire the character of ancestral or coparcenary property in the hands of the sons with reference to their own children. Karnataka High Court.
  • 19-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
The first charge created under the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act prevails over the SARFAESI Act. The security interest created under the SARFAESI Act cannot prevail over the dues payable under the EPFMP Act. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 332-340
The first charge created under the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act prevails over the SARFAESI Act. The security interest created under the SARFAESI Act cannot prevail over the dues payable under the EPFMP Act. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 332-340
  • 19-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Constitution of India. Article 329. Grievance regarding improper rejection of nomination paper can be agitated only through an election petition after the election, and courts cannot carve out exceptions based on the perceived gravity of the illegality, as doing so would undermine the constitutional scheme governing election disputes. Supreme Court.
Constitution of India. Article 329. Grievance regarding improper rejection of nomination paper can be agitated only through an election petition after the election, and courts cannot carve out exceptions based on the perceived gravity of the illegality, as doing so would undermine the constitutional scheme governing election disputes. Supreme Court.
  • 18-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Arbitration and Conciliation. Act. An order rejecting a jurisdictional objection under Section 16 is ordinarily not amenable to writ jurisdiction. Such objections can be challenged only in proceedings under Section 34 after the arbitral award. Allegations of forgery involving disputed questions of fact requiring evidence should ordinarily be adjudicated by the Arbitral Tribunal along with the merits of the dispute. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 286-294
Arbitration and Conciliation. Act. An order rejecting a jurisdictional objection under Section 16 is ordinarily not amenable to writ jurisdiction. Such objections can be challenged only in proceedings under Section 34 after the arbitral award. Allegations of forgery involving disputed questions of fact requiring evidence should ordinarily be adjudicated by the Arbitral Tribunal along with the merits of the dispute. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 286-294
  • 17-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11

Client Reviews

Client Review 1
Client Review 2
Client Review 3
Client Review 4
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article