Suit for possession. When plea of adverse possession fails, question of limitation to institute the suit cannot be pleaded/raised against the plaintiff. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for possession. When plea of adverse possession fails, question of limitation to institute the suit cannot be pleaded/raised against the plaintiff. Karnataka High Court.
  • 02-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Constitution of India. Article 243-U. When term of elected councillors of a Municipality is disrupted by appointment of an administrator, the councillors cannot claim extension for the period the administrator was in charge. Karnataka High Court.
Constitution of India. Article 243-U. When term of elected councillors of a Municipality is disrupted by appointment of an administrator, the councillors cannot claim extension for the period the administrator was in charge. Karnataka High Court.
  • 02-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
  • 21-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
Civil Procedure Code. A pure question of law, such as maintainability of a suit, can be raised at any stage of the proceedings, including in appeal, and even in the absence of specific pleading to that effect. Karnataka High Court.
Civil Procedure Code. A pure question of law, such as maintainability of a suit, can be raised at any stage of the proceedings, including in appeal, and even in the absence of specific pleading to that effect. Karnataka High Court.
  • 02-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Easements Act. To claim protection under Section 60(b) against revocation of a licence, it must be established that the permanent construction was made acting upon the licence granted by the owner. Construction undertaken on the basis of permission from a third party or lessee, without the owner’s authority, does not render the licence irrevocable. Karnataka High Court.
Easements Act. To claim protection under Section 60(b) against revocation of a licence, it must be established that the permanent construction was made acting upon the licence granted by the owner. Construction undertaken on the basis of permission from a third party or lessee, without the owner’s authority, does not render the licence irrevocable. Karnataka High Court.
  • 02-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Forest (Conservation) Act. Land notified as a 'District Forest' or 'Reserved Land' constitutes 'Forest Land' Any non-forest activity including stone crushing or mining on such land is strictly prohibited without prior approval from the Central Government. Karnataka High Court.
Forest (Conservation) Act. Land notified as a 'District Forest' or 'Reserved Land' constitutes 'Forest Land' Any non-forest activity including stone crushing or mining on such land is strictly prohibited without prior approval from the Central Government. Karnataka High Court.
  • 02-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Criminal investigation cannot be used to examine alleged professional misconduct of advocates. Questions concerning professional misconduct of an advocate fall primarily within the disciplinary jurisdiction of the Bar Council. Police investigation cannot be used as a substitute for disciplinary proceedings. Bombay High Court.
Criminal investigation cannot be used to examine alleged professional misconduct of advocates. Questions concerning professional misconduct of an advocate fall primarily within the disciplinary jurisdiction of the Bar Council. Police investigation cannot be used as a substitute for disciplinary proceedings. Bombay High Court.
  • 01-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
A contractual stipulation that arbitration proceedings shall be conducted at a specified place, in the absence of any contrary indication, designates that place as the seat of arbitration, thereby vesting supervisory jurisdiction in the High Court exercising territorial jurisdiction over such seat. Delhi High Court
A contractual stipulation that arbitration proceedings shall be conducted at a specified place, in the absence of any contrary indication, designates that place as the seat of arbitration, thereby vesting supervisory jurisdiction in the High Court exercising territorial jurisdiction over such seat. Delhi High Court
  • 01-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Inclusion in electoral roll raises only a rebuttable presumption of validity; it does not curtail the Election Commission’s power to conduct Special Intensive Revision or delete ineligible names from the voters’ list. Supreme Court.
Inclusion in electoral roll raises only a rebuttable presumption of validity; it does not curtail the Election Commission’s power to conduct Special Intensive Revision or delete ineligible names from the voters’ list. Supreme Court.
  • 28-May-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11

Client Reviews

Client Review 1
Client Review 2
Client Review 3
Client Review 4
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article