Land Acquisition. Principles of res judicata, doctrine of merger, and finality of litigation do not apply when a transaction, administrative action, or judicial decree is subsequently discovered to be tainted by fraud, suppression of material facts, or manipulation of official records. Karnataka High Court quashes the land acquisition proceedings after 37 years.
Land Acquisition. Principles of res judicata, doctrine of merger, and finality of litigation do not apply when a transaction, administrative action, or judicial decree is subsequently discovered to be tainted by fraud, suppression of material facts, or manipulation of official records. Karnataka High Court quashes the land acquisition proceedings after 37 years.
  • 16-July-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Order XXIII Rule 3A CPC. Setting aside a compromise decree. A stranger claiming a derivative title through a party to the suit must approach the compromise-recording court. However, where the claim is based on an independent, pre-existing title, a separate suit is maintainable. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 598
Order XXIII Rule 3A CPC. Setting aside a compromise decree. A stranger claiming a derivative title through a party to the suit must approach the compromise-recording court. However, where the claim is based on an independent, pre-existing title, a separate suit is maintainable. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 598
  • 15-July-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
  • 21-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
DNA Test. When adult plaintiffs voluntarily request a DNA test to establish their biological roots, issues concerning the invasion of their privacy or the social stigmatization of their birth do not arise. When major discrepancies exist in the available oral and documentary evidence, making it insufficient to prove or disprove a biological link, a scientific DNA test is a permissible route to resolve foundational identity questions. Karnataka High Court.
DNA Test. When adult plaintiffs voluntarily request a DNA test to establish their biological roots, issues concerning the invasion of their privacy or the social stigmatization of their birth do not arise. When major discrepancies exist in the available oral and documentary evidence, making it insufficient to prove or disprove a biological link, a scientific DNA test is a permissible route to resolve foundational identity questions. Karnataka High Court.
  • 15-July-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
An agreement to sell executed during a statutory prohibition on sale does not itself amount to a conveyance or transfer of title and is not void ab initio. Where the statutory bar has been repealed before the suit is instituted, the Court cannot deny specific performance only on the basis of the repealed prohibition. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 613
An agreement to sell executed during a statutory prohibition on sale does not itself amount to a conveyance or transfer of title and is not void ab initio. Where the statutory bar has been repealed before the suit is instituted, the Court cannot deny specific performance only on the basis of the repealed prohibition. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 613
  • 15-July-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Default Bail. A mechanical order extending the time to file the charge-sheet, passed without due application of mind, is grossly illegal, arbitrary, and violative of the accused's fundamental right to personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution, thereby entitling the accused to default bail. Supreme Court.
Default Bail. A mechanical order extending the time to file the charge-sheet, passed without due application of mind, is grossly illegal, arbitrary, and violative of the accused's fundamental right to personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution, thereby entitling the accused to default bail. Supreme Court.
  • 15-July-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
POCSO Act. Not every teacher or office-bearer of an educational institution can be prosecuted under Section 21. Only those who directly receive information from the child victim regarding sexual assault and fail to report it can be prosecuted. Mere presence during an internal verification, without receiving such information, does not attract criminal liability. Supreme Court.
POCSO Act. Not every teacher or office-bearer of an educational institution can be prosecuted under Section 21. Only those who directly receive information from the child victim regarding sexual assault and fail to report it can be prosecuted. Mere presence during an internal verification, without receiving such information, does not attract criminal liability. Supreme Court.
  • 14-July-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Anticipatory Bail. Where allegations and counter-allegations appear to be politically motivated and seemingly influenced by such rivalry, rather than disclosing a situation warranting custodial interrogation, and the veracity of the allegations can be tested at trial, anticipatory bail cannot be denied. Supreme Court
Anticipatory Bail. Where allegations and counter-allegations appear to be politically motivated and seemingly influenced by such rivalry, rather than disclosing a situation warranting custodial interrogation, and the veracity of the allegations can be tested at trial, anticipatory bail cannot be denied. Supreme Court
  • 14-July-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Section 498A IPC. In certain cases, in-laws are roped in by an extension of roping the husband. It must be ensured that the law, which was enacted by the legislature as a tool to safeguard women in their marital homes, is not misused to settle personal grudges against every member of the husband's family in the absence of any specific role attributable to them. Supreme Court.
Section 498A IPC. In certain cases, in-laws are roped in by an extension of roping the husband. It must be ensured that the law, which was enacted by the legislature as a tool to safeguard women in their marital homes, is not misused to settle personal grudges against every member of the husband's family in the absence of any specific role attributable to them. Supreme Court.
  • 14-July-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11

Client Reviews

Client Review 1
Client Review 2
Client Review 3
Client Review 4
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article