Representation of the People Act. Hand Book for Returning Officer. Duty cast on the Returning Officer to re-verify rejected postal ballots, where the margin of victory is less than the number of postal ballots rejected, is mandatory. Karnataka High Court orders recount of the postal ballots.
Representation of the People Act. Hand Book for Returning Officer. Duty cast on the Returning Officer to re-verify rejected postal ballots, where the margin of victory is less than the number of postal ballots rejected, is mandatory. Karnataka High Court orders recount of the postal ballots.
  • 07-May-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Specific Relief Act. It is not mandatory for a plaintiff to move an application under Section 28 to annul the judgement since the Court can treat the contract as having rescinded for non-compliance of the condition in the decree. Supreme Court.
Specific Relief Act. It is not mandatory for a plaintiff to move an application under Section 28 to annul the judgement since the Court can treat the contract as having rescinded for non-compliance of the condition in the decree. Supreme Court.
  • 06-May-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
  • 21-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
Habeas Corpus. Custody of child with father cannot be termed as illegal detention since the issue can be considered by a competent Family Court. Karnataka High Court
Habeas Corpus. Custody of child with father cannot be termed as illegal detention since the issue can be considered by a competent Family Court. Karnataka High Court
  • 06-May-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Employees’ Pension Scheme. Employees contributing to the Provident Fund on actual wages exceeding the statutory ceiling are entitled to exercise joint option for higher pension. Such right cannot be denied on the ground of absence of prior option, lack of contribution to the pension fund on higher wages, or restrictive Trust Rules. Karnataka High Court.
Employees’ Pension Scheme. Employees contributing to the Provident Fund on actual wages exceeding the statutory ceiling are entitled to exercise joint option for higher pension. Such right cannot be denied on the ground of absence of prior option, lack of contribution to the pension fund on higher wages, or restrictive Trust Rules. Karnataka High Court.
  • 05-May-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Principle of res judicata applies even at different stages of the same proceedings and issues once decided cannot be reopened by merely altering the prayers. Karnataka High Court.
Principle of res judicata applies even at different stages of the same proceedings and issues once decided cannot be reopened by merely altering the prayers. Karnataka High Court.
  • 04-May-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Income Tax Act. Section 132. ‘Searched Person’ is only the individual named in the warrant and against whom satisfaction is recorded, not someone whose premises are searched. A third party does not become a ‘searched person’ merely because his premises are searched on suspicion of holding another’s material. Karnataka High Court.
Income Tax Act. Section 132. ‘Searched Person’ is only the individual named in the warrant and against whom satisfaction is recorded, not someone whose premises are searched. A third party does not become a ‘searched person’ merely because his premises are searched on suspicion of holding another’s material. Karnataka High Court.
  • 05-May-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Specific performance. While there is a general presumption that time is not of the essence, this presumption stands rebutted where the parties, by express terms of the contract, employ clear, unambiguous, and unequivocal language indicating their intention to prescribe a definite and mandatory period for performance. Karnataka High Court.
Specific performance. While there is a general presumption that time is not of the essence, this presumption stands rebutted where the parties, by express terms of the contract, employ clear, unambiguous, and unequivocal language indicating their intention to prescribe a definite and mandatory period for performance. Karnataka High Court.
  • 05-May-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Mining. Extension of Forest Clearance must conform to the law in force at the time of extension, and prior compliance or executive guidelines cannot override statutory obligations under the current forest regime. Karnataka High Court.
Mining. Extension of Forest Clearance must conform to the law in force at the time of extension, and prior compliance or executive guidelines cannot override statutory obligations under the current forest regime. Karnataka High Court.
  • 02-May-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11

Client Reviews

Client Review 1
Client Review 2
Client Review 3
Client Review 4
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article