Hindu Marriage Act. Persistent and unsubstantiated allegations of extramarital affairs against husband, causing reputational harm and adversely affecting his professional prospects as an actor, amount to cruelty. Karnataka High Court grants divorce to Kannada actor Duniya Vijay.
Hindu Marriage Act. Persistent and unsubstantiated allegations of extramarital affairs against husband, causing reputational harm and adversely affecting his professional prospects as an actor, amount to cruelty. Karnataka High Court grants divorce to Kannada actor Duniya Vijay.
  • 08-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Reservation. When a post is reserved under the horizontal/special category of Persons with Disabilities and is classified as Unreserved/Open, the same is not confined to candidates belonging to the General category alone but is open to all candidates belonging to all vertical social categories, namely SC, ST and OBC, provided they are Persons with Disabilities. Supreme Court.
Reservation. When a post is reserved under the horizontal/special category of Persons with Disabilities and is classified as Unreserved/Open, the same is not confined to candidates belonging to the General category alone but is open to all candidates belonging to all vertical social categories, namely SC, ST and OBC, provided they are Persons with Disabilities. Supreme Court.
  • 07-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
  • 21-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued by husband to wife towards settlement of matrimonial disputes constitutes a 'legally enforceable debt or liability'. The cannot be quashed at the threshold on the plea that such a cheque is not supported by a legally enforceable debt. Supreme Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued by husband to wife towards settlement of matrimonial disputes constitutes a 'legally enforceable debt or liability'. The cannot be quashed at the threshold on the plea that such a cheque is not supported by a legally enforceable debt. Supreme Court.
  • 07-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
A document which is inherently unreadable does not attain readability merely by virtue of being placed on a judicial record. Taking cognizance of a criminal offence on the basis of blank or illegible documents reflects non-application of mind and renders the proceedings liable to be quashed. Karnataka High Court.
A document which is inherently unreadable does not attain readability merely by virtue of being placed on a judicial record. Taking cognizance of a criminal offence on the basis of blank or illegible documents reflects non-application of mind and renders the proceedings liable to be quashed. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Consumer Protection Act. The District Consumer Commission is competent to take cognisance of an offence under Section 72 without directing the complainant to a separate criminal court. An application combining execution-related reliefs with allegations of non-compliance is maintainable, provided the requirements for taking cognisance are satisfied. Karnataka High Court
Consumer Protection Act. The District Consumer Commission is competent to take cognisance of an offence under Section 72 without directing the complainant to a separate criminal court. An application combining execution-related reliefs with allegations of non-compliance is maintainable, provided the requirements for taking cognisance are satisfied. Karnataka High Court
  • 04-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Artificial Intelligence. An adjudicatory order based even partly on unverified, fake, or AI-hallucinated judicial precedents violates the sanctity of adjudication and is liable to be set aside. Supreme Court
Artificial Intelligence. An adjudicatory order based even partly on unverified, fake, or AI-hallucinated judicial precedents violates the sanctity of adjudication and is liable to be set aside. Supreme Court
  • 04-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Karnataka Land Revenue Act. Section 56(1). A statutory revisional authority cannot reopen a decades-old order when the provision expressly limits exercise of revision to three years. Limitation Act cannot be invoked to negate and defeat the limitation prescribed under the KLR Act. Supreme Court.
Karnataka Land Revenue Act. Section 56(1). A statutory revisional authority cannot reopen a decades-old order when the provision expressly limits exercise of revision to three years. Limitation Act cannot be invoked to negate and defeat the limitation prescribed under the KLR Act. Supreme Court.
  • 04-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
SARFAESI Act. When a bank or financial institution governed by the Act acquires a non-performing secured loan from an entity not covered under the Act, the loan immediately becomes a ‘’secured debt’’ enforceable under the SARFAESI Act, irrespective of its origin. Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 517
SARFAESI Act. When a bank or financial institution governed by the Act acquires a non-performing secured loan from an entity not covered under the Act, the loan immediately becomes a ‘’secured debt’’ enforceable under the SARFAESI Act, irrespective of its origin. Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 517
  • 03-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11

Client Reviews

Client Review 1
Client Review 2
Client Review 3
Client Review 4
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article