‘’Public health is a matter of constitutional importance’’. Front-of-Package Warning Labelling regulations shall be enforced to safeguard the collective health and well-being of all persons, especially growing children in India. Supreme Court directs FSSAI/Union Government to provide further scientific and regulatory clarification.
‘’Public health is a matter of constitutional importance’’. Front-of-Package Warning Labelling regulations shall be enforced to safeguard the collective health and well-being of all persons, especially growing children in India. Supreme Court directs FSSAI/Union Government to provide further scientific and regulatory clarification.
  • 11-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Criminal Law. Where the accused had a full opportunity to defend himself against a charge under Section 3 of the POCSO Act, which is substantially akin to the offence under Section 376 IPC, failure of the prosecution to prove that the victim was a minor does not preclude conviction under Section 376 IPC. Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 555.
Criminal Law. Where the accused had a full opportunity to defend himself against a charge under Section 3 of the POCSO Act, which is substantially akin to the offence under Section 376 IPC, failure of the prosecution to prove that the victim was a minor does not preclude conviction under Section 376 IPC. Supreme Court. 2026 Daksha Legal SC 555.
  • 11-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
  • 21-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
Revenue records may prove possession but do not by themselves establish title, and mere long possession cannot mature into adverse possession without a clear and hostile assertion of ownership. Supreme Court
Revenue records may prove possession but do not by themselves establish title, and mere long possession cannot mature into adverse possession without a clear and hostile assertion of ownership. Supreme Court
  • 11-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Criminal Law. Where extradition is subject to a sovereign assurance that the accused would not be imprisoned beyond 25 years, such assurance does not convert the sentence of life imprisonment into a fixed term of 25 years. Consequently, jail-earned remission cannot be added to the period of actual incarceration to advance the date of release; the 25-year limit operates independently as a consequence of the sovereign assurance. Supreme Court
Criminal Law. Where extradition is subject to a sovereign assurance that the accused would not be imprisoned beyond 25 years, such assurance does not convert the sentence of life imprisonment into a fixed term of 25 years. Consequently, jail-earned remission cannot be added to the period of actual incarceration to advance the date of release; the 25-year limit operates independently as a consequence of the sovereign assurance. Supreme Court
  • 11-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Compulsory retirement vitiated by manifest arbitrariness and malafides. Supreme Court orders bidding farewell to the officer with full honour apart from awarding continuity of service, seniority, pay and allowances and the notional promotion.
Compulsory retirement vitiated by manifest arbitrariness and malafides. Supreme Court orders bidding farewell to the officer with full honour apart from awarding continuity of service, seniority, pay and allowances and the notional promotion.
  • 10-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Order XIV CPC. Failure to frame a specific/separate issue does not vitiate a judgment when the parties were fully aware of the lis between them, led their evidence and produced documents on the contentions raised in respective pleadings. Karnataka High Court.
Order XIV CPC. Failure to frame a specific/separate issue does not vitiate a judgment when the parties were fully aware of the lis between them, led their evidence and produced documents on the contentions raised in respective pleadings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 10-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Extension of lease means continuation of the existing lease, whereas renewal creates a new lease. A statutory extension of a mining lease requires no supplementary deed; hence, the State cannot deprive the leaseholder of the right to carry on mining during the statutorily extended period. Karnataka High Court.
Extension of lease means continuation of the existing lease, whereas renewal creates a new lease. A statutory extension of a mining lease requires no supplementary deed; hence, the State cannot deprive the leaseholder of the right to carry on mining during the statutorily extended period. Karnataka High Court.
  • 10-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Contract. A non obstante clause cannot be read in isolation to obliterate other contractual terms; it overrides them only to the extent of an irreconcilable conflict. Where the clauses can be harmoniously construed, effect must be given to the contract as a whole and the commercial understanding of the parties. Karnataka High Court.
Contract. A non obstante clause cannot be read in isolation to obliterate other contractual terms; it overrides them only to the extent of an irreconcilable conflict. Where the clauses can be harmoniously construed, effect must be given to the contract as a whole and the commercial understanding of the parties. Karnataka High Court.
  • 10-September-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11

Client Reviews

Client Review 1
Client Review 2
Client Review 3
Client Review 4
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article