Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act. Upon publication of an attachment order under Section 3, the attached properties vest in the Competent Authority, which is empowered under Section 6 to take physical possession thereof without awaiting further orders of the Special Court. Karnataka High Court.
Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act. Upon publication of an attachment order under Section 3, the attached properties vest in the Competent Authority, which is empowered under Section 6 to take physical possession thereof without awaiting further orders of the Special Court. Karnataka High Court.
  • 15-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Criminal Contempt of Court. Fabrication and production of a forged Power of Attorney, execution of a vakalatnama and filing of objections on behalf of parties without their authority, with a view to manipulating judicial proceedings and securing a favourable order, constitute criminal contempt of court. Karnataka High Court sentences the accused with jail term.
Criminal Contempt of Court. Fabrication and production of a forged Power of Attorney, execution of a vakalatnama and filing of objections on behalf of parties without their authority, with a view to manipulating judicial proceedings and securing a favourable order, constitute criminal contempt of court. Karnataka High Court sentences the accused with jail term.
  • 15-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
  • 21-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
A university cannot make a bona fide student suffer for its own record-keeping errors; where the student's degree and successful completion are established, the authorities must complete verification and facilitate the resulting employment benefits. Supreme Court.
A university cannot make a bona fide student suffer for its own record-keeping errors; where the student's degree and successful completion are established, the authorities must complete verification and facilitate the resulting employment benefits. Supreme Court.
  • 15-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The limitation period of 45 days for filing an appeal to Supreme Court against an NCLAT order commences from the date of pronouncement of the order and not from the date of receipt of its certified copy. Only the time requisite for obtaining the certified copy, after making an application, is excludable under Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act. Supreme Court.
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The limitation period of 45 days for filing an appeal to Supreme Court against an NCLAT order commences from the date of pronouncement of the order and not from the date of receipt of its certified copy. Only the time requisite for obtaining the certified copy, after making an application, is excludable under Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act. Supreme Court.
  • 15-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
A Personal Guarantee creates a personal obligation to the lender. It does not by itself create a proprietary security interest in the assets, unless the Personal Guarantee contains the list of assets and restrains from creating any encumbrance over the assets of the guarantor. Karnataka High Court.
A Personal Guarantee creates a personal obligation to the lender. It does not by itself create a proprietary security interest in the assets, unless the Personal Guarantee contains the list of assets and restrains from creating any encumbrance over the assets of the guarantor. Karnataka High Court.
  • 15-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act. Restrictions on the use of land within the zones specified under the Act do not amount to acquisition or expropriation of property within the meaning of Article 300A of the Constitution of India. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 1434
Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act. Restrictions on the use of land within the zones specified under the Act do not amount to acquisition or expropriation of property within the meaning of Article 300A of the Constitution of India. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 1434
  • 15-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Motor Vehicles Act. Where CCTV footage directly shows the sequence of events without any ambiguity and is backed by the original device on which it was recorded, the Tribunal must admit the evidence as primary evidence. Karnataka High Court.
Motor Vehicles Act. Where CCTV footage directly shows the sequence of events without any ambiguity and is backed by the original device on which it was recorded, the Tribunal must admit the evidence as primary evidence. Karnataka High Court.
  • 15-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Mere use of abusive language does not constitute intentional insult unless intended or likely to provoke a breach of peace. Vague threats of ‘dire consequences’, without a specific threat and the requisite intent to cause alarm, do not constitute criminal intimidation. Where such allegations arise from a civil dispute and fail to disclose the essential ingredients of criminal offences, proceedings are liable to be quashed under Section 528 BNSS. Karnataka High Court.
Mere use of abusive language does not constitute intentional insult unless intended or likely to provoke a breach of peace. Vague threats of ‘dire consequences’, without a specific threat and the requisite intent to cause alarm, do not constitute criminal intimidation. Where such allegations arise from a civil dispute and fail to disclose the essential ingredients of criminal offences, proceedings are liable to be quashed under Section 528 BNSS. Karnataka High Court.
  • 15-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11

Client Reviews

Client Review 1
Client Review 2
Client Review 3
Client Review 4
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article