An Executing Court has no authority to ignore decree for specific performance of sale agreement on the ground that the decree violates SC/ST (PTCL) Act. Karnataka High Court.
An Executing Court has no authority to ignore decree for specific performance of sale agreement on the ground that the decree violates SC/ST (PTCL) Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 12-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
‘Right of user’ by a public utility authority to lay underlying civic infrastructure beneath private property does not amount to a compulsory acquisition or deprivation of property under Article 300A of the Constitution. Karnataka High Court.
‘Right of user’ by a public utility authority to lay underlying civic infrastructure beneath private property does not amount to a compulsory acquisition or deprivation of property under Article 300A of the Constitution. Karnataka High Court.
  • 12-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
  • 21-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
An auction sale under the SARFAESI Act is liable to be set aside where the balance sale consideration is not paid within the prescribed period under Rule 9 of the SARFAESI Rules. In such cases, the borrower’s continuous and bona fide efforts to redeem the secured asset are relevant considerations that must be duly taken into account. Supreme Court.
An auction sale under the SARFAESI Act is liable to be set aside where the balance sale consideration is not paid within the prescribed period under Rule 9 of the SARFAESI Rules. In such cases, the borrower’s continuous and bona fide efforts to redeem the secured asset are relevant considerations that must be duly taken into account. Supreme Court.
  • 11-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Doctrine of forum non-conveniens does not strictly apply to writ proceedings. Where the question of pursuing a constitutional remedy is involved and invocation of writ jurisdiction is traceable to clause (1) of Article 226, the doctrine of forum non conveniens may rarely apply. Supreme Court.
Doctrine of forum non-conveniens does not strictly apply to writ proceedings. Where the question of pursuing a constitutional remedy is involved and invocation of writ jurisdiction is traceable to clause (1) of Article 226, the doctrine of forum non conveniens may rarely apply. Supreme Court.
  • 11-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Commercial Courts Act. Bar under Section 8 against challenge to interlocutory orders does not curtail the constitutional supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution though interference to be limited to errors causing manifest injustice. Karnataka High Court.
Commercial Courts Act. Bar under Section 8 against challenge to interlocutory orders does not curtail the constitutional supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution though interference to be limited to errors causing manifest injustice. Karnataka High Court.
  • 10-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Mere pendency of judicial proceedings, without a specific stay order, does not absolve statutory or administrative authorities from considering applications and passing reasoned orders. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 232-234
Mere pendency of judicial proceedings, without a specific stay order, does not absolve statutory or administrative authorities from considering applications and passing reasoned orders. Karnataka High Court. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 232-234
  • 10-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
A wife cannot file a complaint against her husband, who is a senior citizen, under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 227-231
A wife cannot file a complaint against her husband, who is a senior citizen, under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act. 2026 Daksha Legal Kar 227-231
  • 10-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Mere preferring of an appeal would not, by itself, operate as a stay of the order appealed against. Supreme Court.
Mere preferring of an appeal would not, by itself, operate as a stay of the order appealed against. Supreme Court.
  • 09-June-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11

Client Reviews

Client Review 1
Client Review 2
Client Review 3
Client Review 4
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article