• 

  Eviction order passed by a Civil Court in suit instituted before coming into force of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act can be executed even after the Act came into force. Supreme Court.

  • 16-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Starting point of limitation for violation of order under Section 12 of DV Act is when the order is violated and not when the application was filed. Supreme Court.

  • 15-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  ''Foreign donation is like an intoxicant with medicinal properties and works like a nectar only so long as it is consumed moderately to serve larger cause of humanity''. Supreme Court while upholding amendment to Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act.

  • 14-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Service Law. Bar against changing rules of the game during selection process will not apply when change is announced prior to the holding of the interview. Supreme Court.

  • 16-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Judicial review of subordinate legislation. Court cannot substitute its wisdom with that of the expert rule-making body. Supreme Court reiterates.

  • 16-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Citizen and private persons can not adopt lifting the corporate veil test. They can question identify of the corporate bodies only through courts of law. Kerala High Court.

  • 18-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When fraud is admitted, affording opportunity of being heard is nothing but useless formality especially where consequences would remain unchanged. Jammu and Kashmir High Court.

  • 13-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Land Reforms Act. Though Civil Courts cannot decide question of tenancy, genuineness of the tenancy claim can be gone into to avoid unnecessary reference to Tribunal. Kerala High Court.

  • 15-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Employees of unaided private school are entitled to the same benefits given to employees of Government run schools. Schools cannot plead financial hardship. Delhi High Court.

  • 13-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Mere participation of more than one accused does not constitute criminal conspiracy unless there was meeting of minds among the accused which resulted in crime. Karnataka High Court reiterates.

  • 13-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  State is not vicariously responsible for judgments delivered by Judges. Calcutta High Court rejects plaint against the State seeking 100 Cr. compensation for the alleged defamatory statements in a judgement.

  • 11-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Insecticides Act, 1968. Denial of right to get sample re-analyzed by Central Insecticides Laboratory renders criminal proceedings unsustainable and liable to be quashed. Telagana High Court.

  • 18-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal