A person who was denied registration under the Inams Abolition Act can claim tenancy under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act. Karnataka High Court.
A person who was denied registration under the Inams Abolition Act can claim tenancy under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 17-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Application of Limitation Act to proceedings in relation to any claim or interest pertaining to immovable property comprised in a waqf cannot be said to be prima facie arbitrary. Supreme Court.
Application of Limitation Act to proceedings in relation to any claim or interest pertaining to immovable property comprised in a waqf cannot be said to be prima facie arbitrary. Supreme Court.
  • 17-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
Compulsory registration of wakf created before or after the commencement of the amendment to Wakf Act by execution of a waqf deed. Provision cannot be said to be prima facie arbitrary. Supreme Court.
Compulsory registration of wakf created before or after the commencement of the amendment to Wakf Act by execution of a waqf deed. Provision cannot be said to be prima facie arbitrary. Supreme Court.
  • 17-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Bar of declaration of any land in Scheduled or Tribal area as waqf under the amendment to Wakf Act cannot be said to be prima facie arbitrary. Supreme Court.
Bar of declaration of any land in Scheduled or Tribal area as waqf under the amendment to Wakf Act cannot be said to be prima facie arbitrary. Supreme Court.
  • 17-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
‘’Ancient monuments are a vital part of the cultural heritage of our country and therefore they need to be protected’’. Amendment to Wakf Act terming declaration of protected monument or protected area as waqf as void cannot, prima facie, be held to be arbitrary. Supreme Court.
‘’Ancient monuments are a vital part of the cultural heritage of our country and therefore they need to be protected’’. Amendment to Wakf Act terming declaration of protected monument or protected area as waqf as void cannot, prima facie, be held to be arbitrary. Supreme Court.
  • 17-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Wakf Act amendment: Government property belongs to the citizens and is held by the Government in trust for them. The provision authorising a senior officer to determine whether a property is government property cannot, prima facie, be termed arbitrary, even though a revenue officer cannot adjudicate title. Supreme Court.
Wakf Act amendment: Government property belongs to the citizens and is held by the Government in trust for them. The provision authorising a senior officer to determine whether a property is government property cannot, prima facie, be termed arbitrary, even though a revenue officer cannot adjudicate title. Supreme Court.
  • 17-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Abolition of ‘’Waqf by User’’, aimed at preventing alleged large-scale encroachment of government property, cannot, prima facie, be termed arbitrary. Supreme Court.
Abolition of ‘’Waqf by User’’, aimed at preventing alleged large-scale encroachment of government property, cannot, prima facie, be termed arbitrary. Supreme Court.
  • 17-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
‘’Property which is to be permanently dedicated as a waqf should only be a property which is owned by the person dedicating it’’. Amendment to Wakf Act cannot, prima facie, be termed arbitrary. Supreme Court.
‘’Property which is to be permanently dedicated as a waqf should only be a property which is owned by the person dedicating it’’. Amendment to Wakf Act cannot, prima facie, be termed arbitrary. Supreme Court.
  • 17-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
The opportunity of being heard should be more than just a formality, it must provide substantial compliance with natural justice. Karnataka High Court lays down guidelines for exercise of power under Section 223 (1) of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita.
The opportunity of being heard should be more than just a formality, it must provide substantial compliance with natural justice. Karnataka High Court lays down guidelines for exercise of power under Section 223 (1) of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita.
  • 27-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article