Karnataka Land Reforms Act. ‘Agriculture’ includes raising of grass. If there is evidence to show that a party is in possession of agricultural land, cultivates it and pays land revenue, he is entitled to occupancy rights. Karnataka High Court.
Karnataka Land Reforms Act. ‘Agriculture’ includes raising of grass. If there is evidence to show that a party is in possession of agricultural land, cultivates it and pays land revenue, he is entitled to occupancy rights. Karnataka High Court.
  • 29-April-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Karnataka Rent Act. Carpet area and the area covered by the walls of the premises, constitutes ‘plinth area’, which is to be taken into consideration for the purpose of application of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Karnataka Rent Act. Carpet area and the area covered by the walls of the premises, constitutes ‘plinth area’, which is to be taken into consideration for the purpose of application of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 29-April-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
Upon execution of the sale deed and payment of stamp duty, the agreement to sell merges with the sale deed. No additional stamp duty is payable on the agreement unless the sale consideration differs between the two documents. Karnataka High Court.
Upon execution of the sale deed and payment of stamp duty, the agreement to sell merges with the sale deed. No additional stamp duty is payable on the agreement unless the sale consideration differs between the two documents. Karnataka High Court.
  • 29-April-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Prevention of Corruption Act. Presumption under Section 20 of the Act arises only after the prosecution proves the demand and acceptance. The appellate Courts should not lightly interfere in acquittals unless findings are perverse. Karnataka High Court.
Prevention of Corruption Act. Presumption under Section 20 of the Act arises only after the prosecution proves the demand and acceptance. The appellate Courts should not lightly interfere in acquittals unless findings are perverse. Karnataka High Court.
  • 29-April-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Grounds of arrest. Constitutional courts should not overstep by scrutinizing every detail of the grounds for arrest or second-guessing the investigating authority's discretion. As long as the grounds reflect a clear application of mind and are not based on arbitrariness, the court's role is limited. It cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the investigating authority. Karnataka High Court.
Grounds of arrest. Constitutional courts should not overstep by scrutinizing every detail of the grounds for arrest or second-guessing the investigating authority's discretion. As long as the grounds reflect a clear application of mind and are not based on arbitrariness, the court's role is limited. It cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the investigating authority. Karnataka High Court.
  • 29-April-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Municipal Corporation cannot rescind a khata in its entirety when the dispute involves only portions of the land. Appellate Tribunal must tailor its orders to the scope of the dispute and the parties involved, rather than issuing blanket cancellations. Karnataka High Court.
Municipal Corporation cannot rescind a khata in its entirety when the dispute involves only portions of the land. Appellate Tribunal must tailor its orders to the scope of the dispute and the parties involved, rather than issuing blanket cancellations. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-April-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Husband cannot be saddled with liability to pay maintenance under different maintenance laws. The court has to take into consideration the maintenance already awarded in the previous proceeding and grant an adjustment or set off of the said amount. Karnataka High Court.
Husband cannot be saddled with liability to pay maintenance under different maintenance laws. The court has to take into consideration the maintenance already awarded in the previous proceeding and grant an adjustment or set off of the said amount. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-April-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Arbitration and Conciliation Act. An arbitrator can decide whether a partnership firm is 'at will' which informs the application of Section 43 of the Partnership Act and whether a single partner has the authority to unilaterally dissolve the firm. Karnataka High Court.
Arbitration and Conciliation Act. An arbitrator can decide whether a partnership firm is 'at will' which informs the application of Section 43 of the Partnership Act and whether a single partner has the authority to unilaterally dissolve the firm. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-April-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
The opportunity of being heard should be more than just a formality, it must provide substantial compliance with natural justice. Karnataka High Court lays down guidelines for exercise of power under Section 223 (1) of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita.
The opportunity of being heard should be more than just a formality, it must provide substantial compliance with natural justice. Karnataka High Court lays down guidelines for exercise of power under Section 223 (1) of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita.
  • 27-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article