Attachment before judgment is justified where a strong prima facie case of misappropriation is shown and the defendant’s conduct such as selling another attached property during the litigaton indicates an intent to defeat execution, creating a risk of the decree becoming a paper decree. Karnataka High Court.
Attachment before judgment is justified where a strong prima facie case of misappropriation is shown and the defendant’s conduct such as selling another attached property during the litigaton indicates an intent to defeat execution, creating a risk of the decree becoming a paper decree. Karnataka High Court.
  • 15-November-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Order XI Rule 21 of CPC. If a plaintiff fails to comply with a clear court order directing production of documents, the suit may be dismissed for non-prosecution. Likewise, a written statement may be rejected if the defendant fails to comply with such an order. Karnataka High Court.
Order XI Rule 21 of CPC. If a plaintiff fails to comply with a clear court order directing production of documents, the suit may be dismissed for non-prosecution. Likewise, a written statement may be rejected if the defendant fails to comply with such an order. Karnataka High Court.
  • 15-November-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
Pre-emptive suit by testator for avoiding disputes regarding execution and proof of Will.
  • 21-September-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Article
News
Industrial Disputes Act. A bipartite settlement under Section 18(1) is binding only on the parties to the agreement and does not bind other workers who belong to a separate, non-signatory Union. Karnataka High Court.
Industrial Disputes Act. A bipartite settlement under Section 18(1) is binding only on the parties to the agreement and does not bind other workers who belong to a separate, non-signatory Union. Karnataka High Court.
  • 14-November-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Office of an Advocate cannot be treated as a commercial establishment for the purpose of imposing a commercial electricity tariff, since the legal profession is a regulated intellectual and ethical vocation in aid of justice, founded on personal skill, integrity, and fiduciary responsibility, and not a business or trade activity. Karnataka High Court.
Office of an Advocate cannot be treated as a commercial establishment for the purpose of imposing a commercial electricity tariff, since the legal profession is a regulated intellectual and ethical vocation in aid of justice, founded on personal skill, integrity, and fiduciary responsibility, and not a business or trade activity. Karnataka High Court.
  • 14-November-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Karnataka Stamp Act. Refundable security deposit stipulated in a lease deed does not constitute ‘money advanced in addition to the rent reserved’. Stamp duty on the lease deed must be calculated solely on the basis of the rent reserved, excluding the refundable security deposit. Karnataka High Court.
Karnataka Stamp Act. Refundable security deposit stipulated in a lease deed does not constitute ‘money advanced in addition to the rent reserved’. Stamp duty on the lease deed must be calculated solely on the basis of the rent reserved, excluding the refundable security deposit. Karnataka High Court.
  • 14-November-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Once a party to an arbitration agreement has elected to pursue a judicial remedy by filing a suit before a jurisdictional Civil Court, he is deemed to have waived his right to arbitrate. Application under Section 11 is not maintainable even if the suit is later dismissed. Karnataka High Court.
Arbitration and Conciliation Act. Once a party to an arbitration agreement has elected to pursue a judicial remedy by filing a suit before a jurisdictional Civil Court, he is deemed to have waived his right to arbitrate. Application under Section 11 is not maintainable even if the suit is later dismissed. Karnataka High Court.
  • 14-November-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Motor Vehicles Act. Assessment of the notional income for a minor must be based on the minimum wages payable to a skilled worker. Burden of furnishing the applicable minimum wage data rests on the insurance company if the claimant fails to produce it. Karnataka High Court.
Motor Vehicles Act. Assessment of the notional income for a minor must be based on the minimum wages payable to a skilled worker. Burden of furnishing the applicable minimum wage data rests on the insurance company if the claimant fails to produce it. Karnataka High Court.
  • 14-November-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement
Karnataka Forest Act. A land cannot be treated as ‘forest land’ unless a statutory notification under Section 4 has been duly issued to constitute it as a reserved forest. Mere preparation of statement transferring the land to the Forest department will not take away the right of the landowner. Karnataka High Court.
Karnataka Forest Act. A land cannot be treated as ‘forest land’ unless a statutory notification under Section 4 has been duly issued to constitute it as a reserved forest. Mere preparation of statement transferring the land to the Forest department will not take away the right of the landowner. Karnataka High Court.
  • 13-November-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Judgement

Become A Member Get Instant Update

Daksha Legal Seminars

Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act

  • 03-October-2021 22:43

Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:42

Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code

  • 15-July-2021 03:40

Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court

  • 15-July-2021 03:37

Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)

  • 30-May-2021 17:55

Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021

  • 30-May-2021 04:27

Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.

  • 09-December-2020 06:19

Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore

  • 09-December-2020 06:20

Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.

  • 09-December-2020 06:18

Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate

  • 25-November-2020 06:12

Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.

  • 25-November-2020 06:11
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
  • 07-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
  • 08-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
  • 01-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
  • 30-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
  • 28-September-2024
  • Daksha Legal
Article