• Log In
  • Sign Up
  • 9980065416
Daksha Legal Logo
  • HOME
  • BARE ACTS
  • JUDGMENTS
  • ARTICLES
  • NEWS
  • SEMINARS
  • LAWYERS DIRECTORY
  • Courts
  • ಕನ್ನಡ
Search Sign Up
Search by Citation | Daksha Legal - - -

Hindu Succession Act. Property inherited by children as Class I heirs of a male Hindu dying intestate is held by them in their individual capacity and does not become coparcenary property in relation to their own children. Consequently, grandchildren do not acquire right by birth in such property and cannot seek partition. Supreme Court.

  • 12-November-2026 17:17

Supreme Court of India

J. Rajesh (Minor) through his Mother and Natural Guardian J. Gomathi v. M. Kumaran (Dead) through LRs & Others

Civil Appeal No. 7020 of 2012

Decided on 6 November 2026

Justice Augustine George Masih

Justice Sunita Agarwal

IMPORTAN PARAGRAPHS 31, 34, 35, 39,



SUMMARY AI generated. Ratio Decidendi / Legal Principles

1. Property received on partition: When a son receives property in an earlier partition in his individual capacity, he becomes its absolute owner and can deal with it independently.

2. No automatic birthright: A son or grandson does not automatically acquire coparcenary rights by birth in property that has devolved upon his father under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

3. Section 8 – Succession: Property inherited by a person under Section 8 devolves upon him in his individual capacity and does not automatically become coparcenary property in the hands of his descendants.

4. Effect of partition: Once a partition has taken place and the respective shares have been allotted to the heirs, the joint coparcenary status does not automatically continue in respect of those separately allotted properties.

5. Right to alienate property: A person who becomes the absolute owner of property through partition is entitled to sell or otherwise transfer that property, subject to applicable law.

6. No higher right than the father: A grandson cannot claim a greater right in the property than the right legally available to his father.

7. Unchallenged partition and sale deeds: Where the earlier compromise decree and subsequent sale deeds have not been challenged, a subsequent partition suit cannot simply proceed as though those transactions never took place.

HELD-A son or grandson cannot claim coparcenary rights by birth in property that has devolved upon his father in his individual capacity under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.



Click here to read/download the pdf
High Court of Karnataka Rules. Rule 16 Chapter XIII. High Court registry cannot insist on payment of process fee for notices issued in respect of criminal appeals or references or revision except in cases of appeals or revisions against acquittal, at the instance of private complaints or parties. Karnataka High Court contemplates passing a judicial order.
High Court of Karnataka Rules. Rule 16 Chapter XIII. High Court registry cannot insist on payment of process fee for notices issued in respect of criminal appeals or references or revision except in cases of appeals or revisions against acquittal, at the instance of private complaints or parties. Karnataka High Court contemplates passing a judicial order.
  • 02-November-2026
  • Daksha Legal
From legislative ambiguity to judicial uncertainty: The case for reforming India's law-making process.
From legislative ambiguity to judicial uncertainty: The case for reforming India's law-making process.
  • 23-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Why is a regime-change revolution difficult in India?
Why is a regime-change revolution difficult in India?
  • 21-October-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Daksha Legal Logo

    Quick Links

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Judgements

© All Rights Reserved. Daksha Legal. Website Development by: Right Turn | Privacy Policy