• 

  Income Tax Act. When employer deposits employees contribution towards the EPF and ESI belatedly such sums received by the employer constitutes income. Supreme Court.

  • 17-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When part payment of cheque amount is made before presentation, such payment must be endorsed on the cheque. Otherwise complaint under Section 138, NI Act is not maintainable. Supreme Court.

  • 13-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Interpretation of statutes. ‘Removal of difficulty clause’ cannot be used to change the scheme and essential provisions of a legislation. Supreme Court.

  • 13-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Acquisition for a single company can be made and notifications under Sections 1(3), 3(1) and 28(1) can be issued simultaneously under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966. Supreme Court.

  • 13-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Merely because a person is a director of a company, it is not necessary that he is aware about the day today functioning of the company to make him liable for criminal prosecution under the Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940. Supreme Court.

  • 13-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  A proprietary concern is not required to be arrayed as a separate party in a proceeding under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Karnataka High Court.

  • 13-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Passing of second award for lands acquired under the National Highways Act, 1956 is without jurisdiction which can be quashed by a Writ despite the availability of alternate remedy under the Act. Karnataka High Court.

  • 17-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Corporation cannot demand tax in respect of an industrial plot unless the industrial area is included within the Corporation limits. Karnataka High Court.

  • 14-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Issuance of fifteen days notice for moving no confidence motion under the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act and the Rules is mandatory. Karnataka High Court.

  • 17-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Suit for specific performance. Merely because the agreement does not stipulate any time, the same cannot be expected remain unperformed for all the time to come. Karnataka High Court.

  • 17-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Federation of Karnataka Chambers of Commerce and Industry is not ‘State’ within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India. Karnataka High Court.

  • 18-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When a statutory appeal is rejected as not maintainable, the appellate authority cannot make observations on merits touching the rights of the parties. Karnataka High Court.

  • 11-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal