• 

  MCOC Act. Confessions made before the Superintendent of Police shall not be construed as the approval of the contents or voluntary nature of the alleged confessions. Supreme Court directs.

  • 01-September-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution against a private educational institution is not maintainable unless the act complained has direct nexus with the discharge of public duty. Supreme Court.

  • 29-August-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  A teacher is the lamp of knowledge who moulds the life of children. State must stop appointing teachers on contract basis through outsourced agencies by process of inviting tender. Karnataka High Court.

  • 26-August-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Service Law. Rejection of claim for regularisation on an earlier occasion will not be an impediment for fresh consideration. Karnataka High Court.

  • 25-August-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Criminal prosecution or confiscation proceedings for benami transactions entered into prior to the coming into force of the 2016 Act are unconstitutional. Supreme Court.

  • 23-August-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Prospective allottee of an industrial plot has no right to challenge denotification of lands from the acquisition proceedings. Karnataka High Court.

  • 25-August-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When physical relationship between a man and a woman is purely consensual, criminal proceedings under Section 376 IPC are liable to be quashed. Supreme Court.

  • 24-August-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Cheque bounce case. Dishonor of cheque due to stop payment, account closed and signature mismatch would attract the penal provision. High Court of Jammu and Kashmir.

  • 24-August-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When there is no lapse of acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, compensation can be determined only under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Supreme Court.

  • 24-August-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  BBMP Act 2020. Whenever transfer of property comes to the knowledge of the Chief Commissioner through notice under Section 149, he is bound to enter the name of the transferee in the property tax register. Karnataka High Court.

  • 24-August-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Production of additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27, CPC cannot be as a matter of right. Party must explain why evidence could not be produced in trial court despite due diligence. Karnataka High Court.

  • 24-August-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When grievance is against Company for dishonest misappropriation of property, it is necessary to make the Company accused in the criminal proceedings under Section 403 IPC. Karnataka High Court.

  • 23-August-2022
  • Daksha Legal