• 

  ‘’Our Constitution and the constitutional Courts will protect the new age ‘Karnas’ so they can live like any other citizen with dignity and pride''. Kerala High Court while upholding right to mention only mother’s name in birth certificate.

  • 26-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  After taking benefit under alternate monetary scheme offered by the Government, legal representatives of the deceased employee cannot seek compassionate appointment. Delhi High Court.

  • 26-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When a party to arbitration agreement approaches district Court of a State under Section 9, application under Section 11 can be filed only before the High Court of that State. Supreme Court.

  • 26-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Private complaint in respect of a cognizable offence without complying with Sections 154(1) and 154(3) of Cr.P.C is not maintainable. Karnataka High Court reiterates.

  • 25-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Director of a company who resigned by submitting required Form before the Registrar of Companies cannot be held liable for bouncing of cheque issued after his retirement. Karnataka High Court.

  • 26-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Range Forest Officer cannot register FIR in respect non-cognizable offences under the Karnataka Forest Act without obtaining prior permission from the Magistrate. Karnataka High Court.

  • 25-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Where property is sold under the Partition Act 1893, provisions of Order 21 Rules 84 & 85 CPC regarding mandatory deposit of entire balance sale price within 15 days do not apply. Court can extend time for such payment. Karnataka High Court.

  • 25-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  The expression ‘transfer’ used in Rameshwar vs State of Haryana is not confined to sale, lease or other encumbrance and includes development and/or collaboration agreements, licenses issued during the suspect period. Supreme Court clarifies.

  • 25-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Supreme Court holds Khasgi (Devi Ahilyabai Holkar Charities) Trust, Indore as Public Trust under the Madhya Pradesh Public Trusts Act, 1951.

  • 22-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When a cross objection is not maintainable independently, then there is no question of maintaining two separate order sheets as per Rule 155 of the Civil Rules of Practice. Karnataka High Court.

  • 23-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  In respect of lands notified prior to 1 January 2014 under the KIAD Act, if awards were not passed as on that date, awards are required to be passed only under the 2013 Act. Karnataka High Court.

  • 22-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Courts cannot don the hat of a town planner or that of an Accountant to minutely examine a lesser extent of land would have fulfilled the objective or whether the project could have been implemented satisfactorily at another location. Karnataka High Court

  • 22-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal