• 

  Fee Revision Committee being quasi-judicial authority must hear the school managements before passing orders revising the fee structure in the private educational institutions. Gujarat High Court.

  • 29-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Service Law. Wherever horizontal reservation of eligible candidates are not found, it is the duty of the authorities concerned to then have a vertical reservation. Karnataka High Court.

  • 30-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Trademark. Where the infringing product is visually and phonetically similar having same consumer base, the test in such a matter is not that of absolute confusion. Even likelihood of confusion is sufficient. Delhi High Court.

  • 28-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Repugnancy may arise between two enactments even though obedience to each of them is possible without disobeying the other. Test of two legislations containing contradictory provisions cannot be the determining criterion. Supreme Court.

  • 28-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  'In the matter of grant of exemptions in tax matters, latitude has to be given to the decision making'. Supreme Court while upholding denial of Service Tax exemption to Haj Group Organizers/Private Tour Operators.

  • 28-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  ‘’ACB blissfully ignored the ABC of procedure’’. Karnataka High Court quashes criminal proceedings initiated pursuant to casual act of drawing up source information report, registering FIR and conducting the search by the Anti Corruption Bureau.

  • 27-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Unlike matrimonial proceedings where strict proof of marriage is essential, in proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C strict standard of proof is not necessary when a man and woman cohabit continuously for a number of years. Supreme Court.

  • 28-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Contempt jurisdiction is aimed at maintaining the Court’s dignity and majesty of law. Simply because High Court order is executable, the same cannot be ground not to exercise contempt jurisdiction. Supreme Court.

  • 27-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Lands covered by special orders issued under the Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 are forest lands within the meaning of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. Supreme Court.

  • 27-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Compensation and resettlement methodology as determinable under the land acquisition Act of 2013 is applicable to the acquisition made under National Highways Act. Karnataka High Court.

  • 27-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Plaint in a suit for a primary relief of partition and separate possession cannot be rejected on the ground of limitation though the secondary prayer is barred by time especially when both the prayers are interconnected. Karnataka High Court.

  • 27-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  If a particular procedure in filling up application form is prescribed, the application should be filled up as per that procedure alone. Using different languages in application form and OMR sheet results in disqualification. Supreme Court.

  • 26-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal