• Log In
  • Sign Up
  • 9980065416
Daksha Legal Logo
  • HOME
  • BARE ACTS
  • JUDGMENTS
  • ARTICLES
  • NEWS
  • SEMINARS
  • LAWYERS DIRECTORY
  • Courts
  • ಕನ್ನಡ
Search Sign Up

‘’In matters of law, words are of indispensable importance. Each word, every comma has an impact on the overall understanding of the matter.’’ Supreme Court expresses dissatisfaction over translation of trial court judgement.

  • 20-October-2025 22:00

Zoharbee and another Vs Iman Khan Thr LRS and others.

Civil Appeal 4516-4517 of 2023 decided on 16 October 2025.

Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra.


17. Before parting with the matter, we record our dissatisfaction with the manner in which the judgment of the learned Civil Court was translated into English. In matters of law, words are of indispensable importance. Each word, every comma has an impact on the overall understanding of the matter. Due care has to be taken to ensure that the true meaning and spirit of the words in the original language are translated into English for the Courts in appeal to comprehend what had transpired below. Just recently, a Co-ordinate bench also highlighted similar concern vide order dated 18th March 2025 in Chairman Managing Committee & Anr v. Bhaveshkumar Manubhai Parakhia & Anr. We may only underscore the observations made therein.


Click here to read/download the pdf
Karnataka High Court allows enquiry against H D Kumaraswmy in the land grabbing case.
Karnataka High Court allows enquiry against H D Kumaraswmy in the land grabbing case.
  • 04-December-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Important judgments delivered by Justice H.P. Sandesh. Karnataka High Court.
Important judgments delivered by Justice H.P. Sandesh. Karnataka High Court.
  • 03-December-2025
  • Daksha Legal
 ‘’When Judicial Conviction Meets Technology’’.
‘’When Judicial Conviction Meets Technology’’.
  • 01-December-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Investigating officers conducting an inquiry into a cognizable offence shall not summon an Advocate representing an accused to obtain case-related information, except where the situation squarely falls within one of the recognised exceptions under Section 132 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam. Supreme Court.
Investigating officers conducting an inquiry into a cognizable offence shall not summon an Advocate representing an accused to obtain case-related information, except where the situation squarely falls within one of the recognised exceptions under Section 132 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam. Supreme Court.
  • 29-November-2025
  • Daksha Legal
Daksha Legal Logo

    Quick Links

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Judgements

© All Rights Reserved. Daksha Legal. Website Development by: Right Turn | Privacy Policy