• Log In
  • Sign Up
  • 9980065416
Daksha Legal Logo
  • HOME
  • BARE ACTS
  • JUDGMENTS
  • ARTICLES
  • NEWS
  • SEMINARS
  • LAWYERS DIRECTORY
  • Courts
  • ಕನ್ನಡ
Search Sign Up

Important Judgements delivered by Justice E S Indiresh. Karnataka High Court.

  • 20-May-2026 21:37


1 Sale of property attached towards permanent alimony granted under the Hindu Marriage Act is hit by the provisions of Section 64 of Code of Civil Procedure and Sections 52 and 100 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882. .

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/yNcbnEmI19cgFMjp208uETNd1

2 Karnataka Co-operative Society Rules. Auction purchaser who fails to deposit entire bid amount within time under Rule 38(2)(i) loses all claims to the property and becomes liable for loss occasioned by the subsequent sale. .

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/GJ99QhLk4S01LfwFPyeSFsMGe

3 Procedural laws should advance substantial justice to the parties. Technicalities should not come in the way of extending benefits to litigants who approach the Court with clean hands. .

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/AtRgC9gN30fizTFKXRpS0zPXO

4 Auction purchaser withdrawing from the sale due to the property embroiled in further litigation is entitled for refund of the deposit amount under Order XXI Rule 86 of CPC. .

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/hIKK6F6MHhEwnSV8yfWX9N64f

5 Bombay Public Trust Act. Though alienation of immovable property by the public trust without the previous sanction of the Charity Commissioner is null and void, the challenge to such alienation shall be made within reasonable time. .

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/98zpR5RpmqdQLsx8ZUkQJGwkW

6 Temporary Injunction. Latest and important judgment. Principles reiterated and laid down. .

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/oAFBRx7QzmW18opOYqKjJCU3J

7 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Erroneous part of an award can be separated under proviso to section 34(2) instead of ordering fresh arbitration. .

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/rpOeQqJOk00Pivwdz6ZICaNyd

8 Civil Procedure Code. When written statement is not filed, the court cannot straightway decree the suit. Court must carefully consider ex-parte evidence and give adequate reasons for its judgment. .

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/mgv4ybZNuuCQkknxUy6MhOJck

9 Even adopted children are entitled for compassionate appointment. Rule to the contrary is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. .

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/rRAEZSt6c7UWvh3kqb1pGHJ9X

10 In proceeding under Section 125 Cr.P.C, family Court must accept address provided in the petition supported by an affidavit. Technicality shall not defeat the purpose of the provision aimed at safeguarding wife and children. .

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/qtlw55CyevSLoCZuiHPhxte1N

11 Award of compensation in land acquisition is not as a matter of right and the same is dependent on the persons establishing their title over the property. .

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/oG7lWotQ6kfAjQfiaAEwQSCgH

12 Passing of second award for lands acquired under the National Highways Act, 1956 is without jurisdiction which can be quashed by a Writ despite the availability of alternate remedy under the Act. .

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/Kjni3zORSBUNhtUMCggBFFKuI

13 Government has no power to prescribe fee structure in private unaided Schools. Karnataka High Court strikes down offending provisions of the Karnataka Education Act as unconstitutional.

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/yEc9vIUGYwu0S5hGQXbNiNcMS

14 Tahsildar has no power to evict a person from Government lands under Section 39 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act. .

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/vZ5kPfQbhbj9K6tY0StbO2vyG

15 Hindu Succession Act. Amended Section 6 has no application in respect of property already sold prior to 20th December, 2004 even though the daughters have not joined the sale transaction. .

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/sXRU5s7HrbdXov2CF2lLwxYI6

16 Unregistered relinquishment deed can be relied on for the collateral purpose of proving earlier partition and division of joint family status as recited in the deed. .

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/knY7JAseZj4F0bjklQM9h5doq

17 Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act. Authorities under the Act have no jurisdiction to decide title of parties. Validity of registered Sale Deed cannot be gone into under Sections 70 and 118 of the Act. .

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/eiKffHffADriiTcPOoHHzrFG9

18 Suit for partition. Mere purchase of property in the name of co-sharer does not prove self acquisition when there is joint family nucleus and when independent income is not proved. .

https://www.dakshalegal.com/judgements/actionView/Tw9oVZkpfhVfGIURUrkenLnkv



Important Judgements delivered by Justice M.I. Arun. Karnataka High Court
Important Judgements delivered by Justice M.I. Arun. Karnataka High Court
  • 19-May-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Important Judgments delivered by Justice S R Krishna Kumar. Karnataka High Court.
Important Judgments delivered by Justice S R Krishna Kumar. Karnataka High Court.
  • 18-May-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Important Judgments delivered by Justice Hanchate Sanjeev Kumar. Karnataka High Court.
Important Judgments delivered by Justice Hanchate Sanjeev Kumar. Karnataka High Court.
  • 17-May-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Daksha Legal Logo

    Quick Links

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Judgements

© All Rights Reserved. Daksha Legal. Website Development by: Right Turn | Privacy Policy