• Log In
  • Sign Up
  • 9980065416
Daksha Legal Logo
  • HOME
  • BARE ACTS
  • JUDGMENTS
  • ARTICLES
  • NEWS
  • SEMINARS
  • LAWYERS DIRECTORY
  • Courts
  • ಕನ್ನಡ
Search Sign Up

Advocates Association opposes the proposed transfer of Karnataka High Court Judges.

  • 18-April-2025 10:15

The Advocates Association (R), Dharwad Bench, has addressed a letter to the Hon’ble Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India expressing strong protest against the rumored or proposed transfer of four Karnataka High Court judges:


Key Concerns Raised: Shock and disbelief across the Karnataka Bar over the news of these proposed transfers.


These judges are praised for their selfless service, integrity, legal acumen, empathy, and efficiency.


The transfers are feared to have a disruptive and crippling effect on the functioning of the High Court and the morale of both the Bar and the litigant public.


The move is described as retrogressive and taken without consultation with stakeholders such as the Bar.


The Association has unequivocally and unanimously registered its protest and expressed its unwillingness to accept the transfer of these judges.


The letter is signed by V.M. Sheelvant, President of the Advocates Association (R), High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench. 


Letter enclosed.



Click here to read/download the pdf
Lawyers in the Indian Freedom Movement.
Lawyers in the Indian Freedom Movement.
  • 14-August-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Emperor v. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (Great Trial of 1922). Statement of Mahatma Gandhi made in the Court.
Emperor v. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (Great Trial of 1922). Statement of Mahatma Gandhi made in the Court.
  • 14-August-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Emperor vs Bal Gangadhar Tilak. Sedition. The offence must be determined from the language used and the reasonable, natural and probable effect of the speech as a whole on its audience. Only when it is likely to excite hatred, contempt or disaffection towards the Government, the offence is attracted. Bombay High Court. 1916
Emperor vs Bal Gangadhar Tilak. Sedition. The offence must be determined from the language used and the reasonable, natural and probable effect of the speech as a whole on its audience. Only when it is likely to excite hatred, contempt or disaffection towards the Government, the offence is attracted. Bombay High Court. 1916
  • 14-August-2026
  • Daksha Legal
The ails of Arbitration proceedings
The ails of Arbitration proceedings
  • 09-August-2026
  • Daksha Legal
Daksha Legal Logo

    Quick Links

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Judgements

© All Rights Reserved. Daksha Legal. Website Development by: Right Turn | Privacy Policy