• 

  Employees State Insurance Act does not apply to workmen employed in mining activity. Karnataka High Court.

  • 06-March-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Estoppel. Party taking advantage under a compromise decree cannot question the decree for want of jurisdiction. Karnataka High Court.

  • 05-March-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  A litigant cannot assert title based on entries in the revenue records and mere entry in the revenue records will not constitute an act of adverse possession. Karnataka High Court.

  • 05-March-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Payment of Gratuity Act. Impleading principal instead of the management in claim before the Controlling Authority will not vitiate the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.

  • 05-March-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Once a suit is found to be barred by limitation, the Court cannot go into merits of the case and give findings on other issues. Karnataka High Court.

  • 05-March-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  MV Act. Tribunal cannot simply rely on the pleadings by claimant about his income while applying Section 163A. Tribunal can independently assess the income to give benefit of the section. Karnataka High Court.

  • 04-March-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  ‘’Job of wife also as a mother is indefatigably round the clock.’’ Karnataka High Court awards higher maintenance to wife who was forced by husband to quit her job to take care of the children.

  • 04-March-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Negotiable Instruments Act. When conviction is set aside based on compromise, Court must impose condition that the deviation from the compromise will automatically result in restoration of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.

  • 04-March-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Employers Compensation Act is a beneficial Legislation which requires liberal interpretation. Liability of the insurer cannot be limited to the actual wages paid by the employer. Karnataka High Court.

  • 04-March-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Claim for occupancy rights under the Mysore (Religious and Charitable) Inams Abolition Act cannot be considered without impleading the Temple or the endowment officer as party respondents. Karnataka High Court.

  • 04-March-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Civil Court has jurisdiction to decide shares of joint family members in the properties in respect of which occupancy rights are granted by the Land Tribunal. Karnataka High Court.

  • 02-March-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Review order by the Commissioner under Section 114A of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act. The Standing Committee cannot interfere with the order since it has no appeal power. Karnataka High Court.

  • 01-March-2024
  • Daksha Legal