• 

  Land acquisition. Income Tax exemption provided under Section 96 of 2013 Act does not apply to acquisition of land under any other statutes such as the Karnataka Highways Act. Karnataka High Court.

  • 06-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Karnataka Excise (General Conditions) Rules. Profit sharing ratio change in a partnership firm by 50% and above amounts to ‘’change of control and management of a firm’’ and attracts payment of transfer fee under the Rules. Karnataka High Court.

  • 06-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  ‘’The function of the court ends where the realm of legislature starts’’. Writ Court cannot issue mandamus mandating investigating officer in criminal case to sign on each page of the Court Diary. Karnataka High Court.

  • 06-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  An arbitral award involving monetary claims is a Court decree and cannot be construed to be a movable property to levy stamp duty under the Karnataka Stamp Act. Karnataka High Court.

  • 06-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Karnataka Stamp Act. Once document is admitted in evidence without objection relating to the deficit stamp duty, objection cannot be raised at a subsequent stage. Remedy is revision before the Court where the appeal lies from the orders passed by the Court. Karnataka High Court.

  • 05-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Unless physical possession of property is taken, the Government would not get the benefit of the savings provision in the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act. Karnataka High Court.

  • 05-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Partition. Purchaser of an undivided share cannot claim exclusive share in the joint family properties, seeking allotment of a particular property, without the consent of the other joint family members. Karnataka High Court.

  • 05-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Parallel prosecution. Prosecution under Section 304-A of IPC, while prosecution for the same offence under Section 92 of the Factories Act, 1948 is initiated, is not permissible. Karnataka High Court.

  • 04-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When a registered sale agreement is admitted by the vendor, it is not necessary to examine the witnesses to prove the agreement. Karnataka High Court.

  • 04-November-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Urban Development Authority's imposition of a penalty for non-construction on the allotted site by the allottee within the stipulated period cannot be held to be unreasonable. Karnataka High Court.

  • 30-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Specific Relief Act. Purchaser pendente lite is entitled to come on record as an assignee even at the appellate stage under Order 22 Rule 10 of the Civil Procedure Code. Karnataka High Court.

  • 30-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Specific Relief Act. Relief for possession need not be sought for in a suit for specific performance since in terms of Section 22, the relief of possession would be part of the relief of specific performance. Karnataka High Court.

  • 30-October-2024
  • Daksha Legal