• 

  ‘’Women are the epicenters of family life’’. Women by their very nature deserve preferential treatment inter alia in matters relating to bail, regular or anticipatory. Karnataka High Court.

  • 24-June-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When purchaser files a suit for recovery of the advance sale consideration instead of specific performance, the limitation commences from the date of refusal and not from the date of the agreement. Karnataka High Court.

  • 25-June-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Suit for cancellation of decree obtained on the ground of fraud etc without seeking possession delivered pursuant to the decree is not maintainable. Karnataka High Court.

  • 25-June-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Minimum one kilometre distance from the notified National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuary has to be maintained in establishing, running and operating the quarry units. Karnataka High Court upholds ban on quarrying near Kappathagudda.

  • 25-June-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Accused who breaches settlement agreement in a cheque dishonour case cannot be allowed to go scot-free on hyper-technical grounds without adhering to the conditions of the settlement. Karnataka High Court.

  • 25-June-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  POCSO Act. Document relating to date of birth of a student issued by School on the basis of entry of the date of birth made in the admission register can be relied for the purpose of age determination. Karnataka High Court.

  • 24-June-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Negotiable Instruments Act. Accused who breaches settlement agreement to pay cheque amount cannot later take the contention that the original complaint was defective for not making company a party. Karnataka High Court.

  • 24-June-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Municipal Corporation cannot insist on probate of a Hindu Will for change of khata since the Will executed by Hindus are not covered by Clauses (a) and (b) of Section 57 of the Indian Succession Act. Karnataka High Court.

  • 24-June-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Petition for Succession Certificate under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act cannot be dismissed solely on the ground of limitation. Karnataka High Court.

  • 24-June-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Suit for injunction without disclosing identity of the property as required under Order 7 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code is not maintainable. Karnataka High Court.

  • 24-June-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Land acquisition. Denotification and rescinding the denotification has to be gazetted so that the stakeholders challenge it; and the unscrupulous landowners would not prey the potential buyers on the basis of Denotification. Karnataka High Court.

  • 22-June-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Suit for possession based on illegal dispossession shall be filed within six months from the date of dispossession. Subsequent amendment for possession in a pending suit for injunction will not cure the defect. Karnataka High Court.

  • 22-June-2024
  • Daksha Legal