• 

  Criminal trial. Lack of infrastructure in Forensic Science Laboratories and delay in submitting report is shocking and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution. Karnataka High Court issues directions to bring immediate reforms.

  • 20-January-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Companies Act 2013. Except the Registrar Shareholder and Official Liquidator no other person can initiate any criminal proceedings against a company for the offences under the Act. Karnataka High Court.

  • 24-January-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Bar of limitations vs delay and latches explained by Karnataka High Court.

  • 20-January-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  It is high time strict norms are laid down to regulate method of law reporting. Karnataka High Court.

  • 20-January-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Civil Procedure Code. Amendment of written statement to add counter claim. A prayer for counter claim or decree cannot be belatedly superadded once the same becomes time barred. Karnataka High Court.

  • 19-January-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Constitutional validity of Sections 3 and 4 and 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Amendment Act 2020 upheld by the Supreme Court.

  • 19-January-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Authoritative pronouncement of the Karnataka High Court on the tests of motive eye witness interested witness independent witness unlawful assembly in a criminal trial.

  • 19-January-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Karnataka High Court upholds constitutional validity of the Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act 2011.

  • 19-January-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Creating posts having trappings of the Ministers to overcome the upper ceiling limit under Article 164 1-A is ultra vires the constitutional mandate. Karnataka High Court.

  • 18-January-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Challenge to appointment of M.P. Renukacharya and others as Advisors to Chief Minister. High Court of Karnataka orders notice on the PIL filed by Samaj Parivarthana Samudaya.

  • 18-January-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Civil Procedure Code. Attachment before judgment. The purpose of Order 38 Rule 5 is not to convert an unsecured debt into a secured debt. Any attempt by a plaintiff to utilise the provision as a leverage for coercing the defendant to settle the suit claim

  • 18-January-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Civil Procedure Code. Order 40 Rule 1. Appointment of a Receiver in pending suit is only on a prima facie finding that the plaintiff has an excellent chance of success in the suit. Supreme Court.

  • 18-January-2021
  • Daksha Legal