• 

  Transfer of Property Act. Gift. Delivery of possession is not a necessary condition for a valid gift.

  • 17-July-0004
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  I.R. Coelho vs State of Tamil Nadu

  • 11-January-2007
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. Appeal under section 37 would be maintainable against an order refusing to condone delay in filing an application under section 34 to set aside an award. Supreme Court.

  • 11-February-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Negotiable Instruments Act. Even a blank cheque leaf voluntarily signed and handed over by the accused towards some payment would attract presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Supreme Court.

  • 23-January-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Income Tax Act. All the Directors of the Company cannot be automatically prosecuted for any violation of the Income Tax Act. There has to be specific allegations made against each of the Directors who is intended to be prosecuted. Karnataka High Court.

  • 16-January-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Negotiable Instruments Act. Section 138. Accused can be convicted even when the legally enforceable debt is less than the amount mentioned in the cheque. Karnataka High Court.

  • 03-February-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Cruelty to animals. Release of seized animals to the accused owner pending investigation is not proper when there are serious allegations of cruelty. Karnataka High Court.

  • 09-February-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Lok Adalat award in respect of cheque bounce case. Amount can be recovered by Fine Levy Warrant under Section 421 Cr.P.C. Karnataka High Court.

  • 16-January-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Minerva Mills Ltd vs Union of India

  • 09-May-1980
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Private Schools. Supreme Court permits educational institutions to collect fee subject to conditions.

  • 08-February-2021
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Hindu Law. Member of a joint Hindu family can bring separation only by a definite and unequivocal declaration of his intention communicated to other members. Uncommunicated intention does not bring severance of joint family. Supreme Court

  • 09-April-1963
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Suit for possession based on title. When plaintiff creates a high degree of probability - onus shifts on defendant who has to discharge it. Burden of plaintiff is not beyond reasonable doubt. Supreme Court

  • 08-October-2003
  • Daksha Legal