• 

  Mere participation of more than one accused does not constitute criminal conspiracy unless there was meeting of minds among the accused which resulted in crime. Karnataka High Court reiterates.

  • 13-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  State is not vicariously responsible for judgments delivered by Judges. Calcutta High Court rejects plaint against the State seeking 100 Cr. compensation for the alleged defamatory statements in a judgement.

  • 11-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Insecticides Act, 1968. Denial of right to get sample re-analyzed by Central Insecticides Laboratory renders criminal proceedings unsustainable and liable to be quashed. Telagana High Court.

  • 18-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Service Law. Non disclosure of material information while applying for job can be a ground for termination of service. Supreme Court.

  • 12-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Employee who disappears after suspension order is passed cannot take advantage of his deliberate absence to claim benefits. Supreme Court.

  • 13-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Community certificate is irrelevant when appointment is is made under disability quota and not based on community. Supreme Court.

  • 14-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Employees appointed on contractual basis without any advertisement and contrary to the provisions of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, do not have right to regularization. Punjab and Haryana High Court.

  • 14-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Mere creation of a website or projecting it as sister concern of another website owned by the accused without any intent to commit fraud does not amount to an act of forgery. Supreme Court.

  • 17-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Jurisdictional error can not result in exoneration of liability. Courts can quash the order passed by an incompetent authority and remand the matter back for fresh adjudication. Madras High Court.

  • 15-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Adverse possession explained. The same based on the theory or presumption that the owner has abandoned the property to the adverse possessor on the acquiescence of the owner to the hostile acts and claims of the person in possession. Supreme Court.

  • 09-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Complaint u/s 138 N.I. Act filed without application to condone delay. Limitation issue raised for the first time in appeal. Appellate Court can send matter back to trial court by permitting complainant to file necessary application. Karnataka High Court.

  • 09-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Plaintiff in a suit cannot array defendant as represented by GPA holder with address of the said GPA holder without showing address of the defendant. Karnataka High Court.

  • 09-April-2022
  • Daksha Legal