• 

  Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act applies only when the transfer is subject to a condition of providing the basic amenities and basic physical needs to the transferor/senior citizen. Supreme Court.

  • 09-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  After collecting premium for one year, Insurance Company cannot disown its liability on the ground that the registration of the vehicle expired in the meanwhile. Karnataka High Court.

  • 07-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Karnataka Prohibition of Charging Exorbitant Interest Act, 2004 . Police conducting raid without registering FIR at the first instance is illegal. Karnataka High Court.

  • 07-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Mere denial of marriage with complainant is not a ground to quash the proceedings for the offences under section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code. Orissa High Court.

  • 07-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Principal employer paying salary and PF contribution of the contractor’s employees does not make them employees of the principal employer. Supreme Court.

  • 07-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Price charged from independent parties for the sale of excisable goods can be used as a benchmark for determination of excise duty on related transactions when such a price is readily available. Supreme Court.

  • 07-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  In a suit for specific performance, the proposed buyer can be impleaded to avoid multiplicity of the proceedigs. High Court of Chhattisgarh

  • 06-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Increasing litigation in public distribution system. “Stop indiscriminate allotment of fair price shops or discriminate distribution of cards”. Karnataka High Court.

  • 06-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  “There should be devotion in politics; and not politics in devotion”. Karnataka High Court restrains shifting of deity to old/dilapidated temple, in public interest.

  • 06-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Application for permission to sue as an indigent person can be rejected if the allegations in the plaint do not show any cause of action or if the suit is barred by res judicata. Supreme Court.

  • 06-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When due to pendency of the land acquisition proceedings, the possession could not be taken over, the landowners cannot contend that the land acquisition proceedings have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Act, 2013. Supreme Court.

  • 06-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  A co-owner cannot seek temporary injunction against another co-owner on the ground of adverse possession unless there is a partition of the property by metes and bounds. Karnataka High Court.

  • 03-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal