• 

  Contract of insurance is an indemnity of a defined loss and hence the insured cannot profit and take advantage by double insurance. Supreme Court.

  • 05-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Increments granted to an employee while in service cannot be recovered long period after retirement even if the said increment were granted on account of an error. Supreme Court.

  • 05-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Acts of riot cannot be equated with acts of terrorism to repudiate insurance policy by invoking exclusion clause. Supreme Court.

  • 04-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  ''Decision taken by the Union of India to vaccinate children is in tune with global scientific consensus and expert bodies. Courts cannot second guess such expert opinion''. Supreme Court.

  • 04-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Service law. Mere suppression of material information or giving false information in a given case does not mean that the employer can arbitrarily discharge or terminate the employee from service. Supreme Court.

  • 04-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Daksha Legal Monthly Digest - April 2022

  • 03-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Service law. Principle that 'Rules of the game cannot be changed once the game has begun’ does not apply if the change is not illegal or contrary to any provision of law. Karnataka High Court.

  • 02-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Court or Tribunal cannot impound insufficiently stamped document unless and until the parties produce the document on record. Supreme Court.

  • 02-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  An exclusive jurisdiction clause regarding seat of arbitration and place of suing will oust the jurisdiction of all other courts even though no cause of action has arisen in the seat of arbitration. Delhi High Court.

  • 14-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Madras High Court declares Mother Nature as a Living Being having legal entity, juristic/juridical/moral person having rights akin to fundamental rights.

  • 03-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Correctness of a judicial order violated by the contemnor can not be decided In contempt proceedings. Andhra Pradesh High Court.

  • 01-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Merely because an order or decree is executable, it would not take away the jurisdiction of the Court to deal with the matter under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Delhi High Court.

  • 06-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal