• 

  Power of attorney holder of an accused in a criminal case cannot maintain a Petition be it under Article 226 or 227 of the Constitution of India or Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Karnataka High Court.

  • 09-June-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Interpretation of statutes. Proviso to a provision cannot control the main provision nor be interpreted in a manner which renders the main provision nugatory or otiose. Karnataka High Court.

  • 09-June-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Karnataka Land Reforms Act. Order of the Tribunal without bringing all the legal representatives of the deceased landlord on record is a nullity in the eye of law. Karnataka High Court.

  • 08-June-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Claimant who was compensated by his own insurer is not entitled to get compensation again for the very same damages from the owner or insurer of the offending vehicle. Kerala High Court.

  • 08-June-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  ''Upload and update contact details of persons in-charge of litigation in the local bodies on the official websites for the effective service of court notices’’. Karnataka High Court directs the Principal Secretary to Govt.

  • 07-June-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Provisions of CPC and Evidence Act are not applicable to proceedings under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The Commissioner can lay down his own procedure and rely upon documents produced before it. Delhi High Court.

  • 08-June-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Though a Society cannot be characterized as a 'State' within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India, a Writ would lie against it to enforce a statutory public duty cast upon the Society. Madras High Court.

  • 08-June-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Public nuisance. Executive Magistrate must afford sufficient opportunities to the parties and record evidence and arrive at a legal finding that the action complained has resulted in nuisance to the general public at large. Karnataka High Court.

  • 07-June-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Second petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash criminal proceedings is maintainable only in exceptional cases where there are changed circumstances. Karnataka High Court

  • 07-June-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Judicial decision is as per law, administrative decision is as per policy & quasi-judicial function lying in between is an administrative function to be exercised in some respects as if it were judicial. Supreme Court explains.

  • 08-June-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Holder of Light Motor Vehicle driving license driving Transport Vehicle does not amount to fundamental breach of the insurance policy so as to avoid the liability of the insurance company. Karnataka High Court.

  • 06-June-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Contract with Government. Court cannot direct the parties to enter into an agreement awarding the work. Delhi High Court.

  • 08-June-2022
  • Daksha Legal