• 

  When a cross objection is not maintainable independently, then there is no question of maintaining two separate order sheets as per Rule 155 of the Civil Rules of Practice. Karnataka High Court.

  • 23-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  In respect of lands notified prior to 1 January 2014 under the KIAD Act, if awards were not passed as on that date, awards are required to be passed only under the 2013 Act. Karnataka High Court.

  • 22-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Courts cannot don the hat of a town planner or that of an Accountant to minutely examine a lesser extent of land would have fulfilled the objective or whether the project could have been implemented satisfactorily at another location. Karnataka High Court

  • 22-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Police officers have no powers to suspend a driving licence since such powers are given only to Licensing Authority under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Calcutta High Court

  • 23-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Arbitration. At the stage of deciding Section 11 application, the Court may prima facie consider even the aspect with regard to ‘accord and satisfaction’ of the claims. Supreme Court.

  • 23-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When correction of arbitration award is sought, limitation to challenge award commences from the date on which request for correction of award has been disposed of by arbitrator and not from the date of the original award. Karnataka High Court.

  • 22-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Substantial question of law under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act need not necessarily be a question of law of general importance. Karnataka High Court explains the meaning and scope of Section 260A.

  • 23-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Land acquisition cannot be frowned upon for lack of detailed consideration in Section 5-A report unless it is shown to be violative of provisions of the Act or in colourable exercise of power. Karnataka High Court.

  • 22-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Supreme Court explains power and jurisdiction of the Appellate Tribunal under SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations and that of the Appellate Tribunal under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act.

  • 21-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Ordinarily in matters of recruitment, only aggrieved candidate can complain against illegalities in the process. Association of employees cannot espouse individual/personal cause of its members. Karnataka High Court.

  • 21-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When sole plaintiff dies and application is filed by persons claiming to be legal representatives, it is the duty of the Court to consider whether the right to sue survives. Karnataka High Court.

  • 21-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Owner/driver of private vehicle from which ganja was seized cannot plead absence of ''conscious possession'' since the standard of ‘conscious possession’ is different in case of private vehicle with few persons known to one another. Karnataka High Court

  • 21-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal