• 

  Criminal Procedure Code. Section 482. When chances of an ultimate conviction are bleak, Court must exercise power to quash criminal proceedings. Kerala High Court.

  • 21-March-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Police can NOT conduct preliminary enquiry when information disclosing commission of cognizable offence is received. Police can initiate such enquiry only after registering FIR. Karnataka High Court.

  • 19-March-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Partnership Act, 1932. Even if a partnership deed specifically says that it is 'at will’, it need not be so if contrary intention is revealed or its duration can be implied from the terms/clauses. Kerala High Court.

  • 19-March-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When judgment debtor pleads no means to pay decree debt, executing Court must conduct enquiry under Order XXI Rule 40 CPC before issuing warrant of arrest against him. Kerala High Court.

  • 18-March-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Bar under Section 362 Criminal Procedure Code applies to applications seeking substantive review and not procedural review. Supreme Court.

  • 18-March-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Suit for permanent injunction based on part-performance possession under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act is maintainable. Punjab and Haryana High Court.

  • 18-March-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Renewal of passport. Authorities cannot insist on production of facilitative order from the Court simply because criminal case is pending against the passport holder. Karnataka High Court.

  • 18-March-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Motor Vehicles Act. Section 133. There is no provision under the Act empowering the authorities to call for production of licence of the registered owner. Kerala High Court.

  • 17-March-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Consumer Protection Act. Losing case on merits after advocate argued matter cannot be said to be deficiency in service on the part of the advocate. Supreme Court.

  • 17-March-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When electronic evidence in CD or Pendrive is found to be not authentic, Courts cannot direct party to give his voice sample to be compared with the voice contained in the CD or Pendrive. Punjab High Court.

  • 17-March-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Permission to mark document or marking of a document does not by itself amount to admission in evidence, unless it is specifically admitted by the parties. Kerala High Court.

  • 17-March-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Negotiable Instruments Act. The fact that the body of cheque was not filled up by accused himself-is no defence in itself when signature on the cheque is not disputed. Punjab High Court.

  • 17-March-2022
  • Daksha Legal