• 

  Supreme Court upholds Delimitation Commission for the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir under the Delimitation Act, 2002 and the exercise of delimitation undertaken by the Commission.

  • 15-February-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  A judge is judged everyday by the lawyers, litigants and the public, as the courts are open and the judges speak by giving reasons in writing for their decisions. Supreme Court.

  • 16-February-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Supreme Court cannot issue a writ of certiorari quashing the recommendation, or mandamus calling upon the Collegium of the Supreme Court to reconsider its decision. Supreme Court.

  • 15-February-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Plaint in a suit for partition based on amended Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act is liable to be rejected if there is clear admission in the plaint about registered partition of ancestral properties prior to the amendment. Karnataka High Court.

  • 14-February-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Dowry Prohibition Act 1961. Wife roping in entire family members of husband with ulterior motive of wreaking vengeance. Such proceedings are liable to be quashed. Karnataka High Court.

  • 13-February-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Motor Vehicles Act. Vehicle covered under valid insurance policy driven by person without a driving licence at the time of accident. Insurance company has to pay compensation and recover the same from the owner. Karnataka High Court.

  • 13-February-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Stay of execution pending suit between decree holder and judgement debtor. Order 21 Rule 29 CPC will not apply to suits which are instituted subsequent to institution of the execution proceedings. Karnataka High Court.

  • 14-February-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Government cannot act as a robber of citizens lands; taking away private lands for the purported public purpose without compensation against the spirit of constitutional guarantee enacted u/a 300A. Karnataka High Court.

  • 14-February-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Political background, by itself, though a relevant consideration, cannot be an absolute bar for appointment of otherwise a suitable person as Judge. Supreme Court.

  • 14-February-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Suit for partition. Plea of exclusive possession by the purchaser of coparcenery property is NOT a conclusive factor to determine court fee payable by the plaintiff. Karnataka High Court.

  • 13-February-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Non-compliance of mandatory provisions of Order 21 Rules 84, and 85 CPC by the auction purchaser vitiates the sale. Supreme Court.

  • 14-February-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Even non-signatories will be bound by the arbitration agreement, if there is implied consent to be bound and a direct relationship with the signatory. Karnataka High Court.

  • 10-February-2023
  • Daksha Legal