• 

  Land acquisition. In deciding whether acquisition is for public or not, prima facie, the Government is the best judge. Supreme Court.

  • 01-June-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Fixing of fee for patent applications is a right vested in the Government. Reduction of fee cannot be given retrospective effect by the Court. Delhi High Court.

  • 04-June-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Magistrate cannot condone delay in filing private complaint, under Section 473 Cr.P.C. without issuing notice to accused/respondent. Karnataka High Court.

  • 01-June-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  IBC. Holder of the Recovery Certificate issued under the Debt Recovery Act is also a financial creditor. He can initiate CIRP within a period of three years from the date of issuance of the Certificate. Supreme Court.

  • 01-June-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Deprivation of property within the meaning of Article 300A, generally speaking, must take place for public purpose or public interest. Supreme Court.

  • 31-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  In a proceeding of pre-emption, save and except in any remote possible case, question of title over any deed duly executed and registered cannot be adjudicated. Calcutta High Court.

  • 31-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Though equal opportunity in public employment a constitutional mandate, appointment cannot be claimed as a matter of absolute right. Madras High Court

  • 31-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Donoghue v Stevenson - (The Snail and the Ginger Beer case)

  • 30-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Aggrieved person can seek interim maintenance before the Magistrate under DV Act while also seeking a permanent maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. Delhi High Court.

  • 01-June-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  In a contempt jurisdiction, court can consider only those directions which are plainly self-evident to determine the violation or disobedience. Delhi High Court.

  • 31-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Real Estate Appellate Tribunal has no power to initiate suo moto proceedings under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Delhi High Court.

  • 30-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 does not contemplate notice to be given to the tenant when the tenancy has been extinguished. Calcutta High Court.

  • 30-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal