• 

  Though equal opportunity in public employment a constitutional mandate, appointment cannot be claimed as a matter of absolute right. Madras High Court

  • 31-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Donoghue v Stevenson - (The Snail and the Ginger Beer case)

  • 30-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Aggrieved person can seek interim maintenance before the Magistrate under DV Act while also seeking a permanent maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. Delhi High Court.

  • 01-June-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  In a contempt jurisdiction, court can consider only those directions which are plainly self-evident to determine the violation or disobedience. Delhi High Court.

  • 31-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Real Estate Appellate Tribunal has no power to initiate suo moto proceedings under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. Delhi High Court.

  • 30-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 does not contemplate notice to be given to the tenant when the tenancy has been extinguished. Calcutta High Court.

  • 30-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Taking cognizance by the criminal Court cannot be set aside on the ground of defective or illegal investigation, unless illegality in investigation can be shown to have brought about miscarriage of justice. Karnataka High Court.

  • 30-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  ‘’Right to nutritious food is a fundamental right of pregnant woman, lactating mothers and children’’. Karnataka High Court directs the State Govt to implement ICDS without further delay and to submit compliance report

  • 28-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  No party should suffer due to the act of court. Right accrued as on the date of writ petition cannot be taken away by amendment inserted during the pendency of the petition. Karnataka High Court.

  • 29-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Casual workers doing continuing work are entitled for benefit of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948. Supreme Court.

  • 28-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Conviction based on circumstantial evidence. The circumstances ''must or should be'' established and not ''may be'' established. Supreme Court reiterates.

  • 28-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Unlike Company, if an offence is committed by Partnership Firm, it is an offence committed by its partners. There is no need to make Partnership Firm an accused in criminal case. Karnataka High Court.

  • 28-May-2022
  • Daksha Legal