• 

  Cheque bounce case. Directors/Chairman of a company cannot claim that they are not privy to the transaction between the accused and the complainant when the complaint clearly narrates their role in the transaction. Karnataka High Court.

  • 05-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Mahazar drawn contrary to Section 100 (4) Cr.P.C. is only irregular. Same cannot be termed as illegal if seizure can be proved upon search conducted. Karnataka High Court.

  • 06-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Negotiable Instruments Act. Directors of a company cannot be held vicariously guilty of the offence punishable under Section 138 when the company is not arrayed as an accused in the complaint. Karnataka High Court reiterates.

  • 06-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Kerala Industrial Single Window Clearance Act 1999. Establishments in notified industrial area enjoy statutory exemption from securing clearances from the local bodies and payment of property tax. Kerala High Court.

  • 06-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Accident involving overloaded auto-rickshaw. Insurance company should pay compensation even in respect excess number of passengers and recover the same from the insured. Karnataka High Court.

  • 06-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Validity of a trademark cannot be questioned in the infringement proceedings more so when it is old and established and well-known trademark. Delhi High Court.

  • 05-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Criminal Law. Doctrine of sameness does not apply when the complainants are different and there is no certainty of time and period. Karnataka High Court.

  • 05-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Interference by High Court under Article 227 possible only in case of patent perversity in the orders or where there has been gross and manifest failure of justice or the basic principles of natural justice have been flouted. Kerala High Court.

  • 05-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Violation of basic human right to property. Jammu and Kashmir High Court awards present day market value compensation, rental compensation and special penalty towards illegal occupation of private property by the Government.

  • 04-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Arbitration award. The date for quantifying the stamp duty payable on the award is the date on which the award was signed. Karnataka High Court.

  • 04-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Daksha Legal Monthly Digest - June 2022

  • 02-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Rank trespassers on public/reserved forest land, are not entitled to any equitable remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Such persons are not entitled to any prior notice before eviction. Delhi High Court.

  • 02-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal