• 

  Income Tax Act. Sufficiency or inadequacy of the reasons cannot be gone into while considering the validity of an act of authorization to conduct search and seizure except on the ground of the Wednesbury Principle of Reasonableness. Supreme Court.

  • 15-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Though litigation is not gambling yet there is an element of chance in every litigation. Time spent during litigation can be excluded in some cases even in the absence of any interim order. Supreme Court.

  • 15-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Specific Relief Act. Payment of an insignificant advance amount as against considerable sale price, will not entitle purchaser to discretionary equitable relief of specific performance. Supreme Court.

  • 14-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Specific Relief Act. Readiness. Fact that limitation is three years does not mean that purchaser can wait till the end of limitation to file a suit for specific performance. Supreme Court.

  • 15-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Existence of debt and default by Corporate Debtor in payment of the debt would not automatically result in admission of the petition by the NCLT under Section 7 of the IBC. Supreme Court.

  • 14-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Plaintiff cannot be permitted to join any party as a defendant who may not be necessary and/or proper parties at all on the ground that the plaintiffs is the dominus litus. Supreme Court.

  • 15-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Demarcation of land in the Master Plan for road widening would not vest the land with the State/BDA. State/BDA cannot seek relinquishment of such land as a pre-condition for plan sanction without paying compensation. Karnataka High Court.

  • 14-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Specific Relief Act. Where a certain amount has been paid in advance and the balance is required to be paid within a stipulated time, it is for the Plaintiff to show that he was in a position to pay the balance money. Supreme Court.

  • 14-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Copyright. Author of a work is the first owner of the copyright and in relation to a cinematograph film, the producer is th e author and thus the first owner of the copyright therein. Delhi High Court.

  • 14-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Make sure that men of integrity are posted to Anti Corruption Bureau which is established to prevent corruption. Karnataka High Court directs the Chief Secretary to Government.

  • 12-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Rates mentioned in the Ready Reckoner, which are basically for the purpose of collection of stamp duty cannot be the basis for determination of the compensation for the lands acquired under the Land Acquisition Act. Supreme Court.

  • 13-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Assigned copyright to remake/dub a movie in a particular language is not violated if the movie is remade in a different language and then dubbed to the particular language. Delhi High Court.

  • 13-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal