• 

  ''Every order or transaction pursuant to fraudulent act is void ab initio and the same cannot be allowed to stand''. Karnataka High Court, while ordering restoration of khata which was fraudulently changed.

  • 12-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Person who claims compensation for illegal dispossession of land must prove his prior possession. Mere sale deed in his favour is not enough to claim compensation. Delhi High Court.

  • 11-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Compensation for actual damages in a motor vehicle accident includes value of spare parts to be repaired. Kerala High Court

  • 13-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Constitutional Courts can monitor criminal investigation, especially in crimes involving corruption, in order to prevent corruption in the society. Karnataka High Court.

  • 09-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  The power of the Government to make laws determining the service conditions of its employees or amend such laws cannot confer them the power to apply such laws differently to similarly situated persons. Kerala High Court.

  • 11-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Special Power of Attorney holder who is aware of the transaction can initiate proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Karnataka High Court.

  • 09-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Cheque bounce case. Taking sworn statement first then taking cognizance and issuing summons would not vitiate the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.

  • 08-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Criminal Law. When the article from which 'chance fingerprint' was lifted is not produced, mere report of the fingerprint expert cannot be relied on. Karnataka High Court.

  • 11-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Mere breach of a development agreement cannot be made use of by the prospective purchaser to set criminal law in motion alleging criminal breach of trust. Karnataka High Court.

  • 11-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Mesne profits payable by tenant shall be at the same rate at which the landlord would have able to let out the premises in present and earn the profit if the tenant would have vacated the premises. Supreme Court.

  • 08-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Rejection of plaint. If the Court finds the suit to be manifestly vexatious not disclosing any right to sue, it would be justified in exercising the power under Order VII Rule 11A CPC. Delhi High Court.

  • 08-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Change of entries in property register by playing fraud. Such fraudulent entry can be set aside in a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Karnataka High Court.

  • 08-July-2022
  • Daksha Legal