• 

  Cheque bounce case. Dishonor of cheque due to stop payment, account closed and signature mismatch would attract the penal provision. High Court of Jammu and Kashmir.

  • 24-August-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When there is no lapse of acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, compensation can be determined only under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Supreme Court.

  • 24-August-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  BBMP Act 2020. Whenever transfer of property comes to the knowledge of the Chief Commissioner through notice under Section 149, he is bound to enter the name of the transferee in the property tax register. Karnataka High Court.

  • 24-August-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Production of additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27, CPC cannot be as a matter of right. Party must explain why evidence could not be produced in trial court despite due diligence. Karnataka High Court.

  • 24-August-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When grievance is against Company for dishonest misappropriation of property, it is necessary to make the Company accused in the criminal proceedings under Section 403 IPC. Karnataka High Court.

  • 23-August-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Acceptance of lesser share by father in ancestral properties in family partition will not prevent his son from claiming actual/correct share in the properties. Karnataka High Court.

  • 23-August-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Post-acquisition allottee has no locus standi to challenge de-notification of lands under acquisition relying on the doctrine of promissory estoppel. Karnataka High Court.

  • 23-August-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Companies Act. Proceedings under Section 630, penalty for wrongful withholding of property, cannot be resorted to when there is bonafide dispute regarding the right of the company over the property in question. Delhi High Court.

  • 23-August-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  ''The test to be applied for judging the claim of infringement and passing off is of an unwary consumer with average intelligence and imperfect recollection.'' Delhi High Court reiterates.

  • 23-August-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Transfer of case under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act from one State to another. High Court within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer has passed the order will continue to exercise the jurisdiction of appeal. Supreme Court.

  • 20-August-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Inconsistency test between laws made by Parliament and laws made by the Legislatures of States under Article 254 applies only to the laws made after the implementation of the Constitution of India. Supreme Court reiterates.

  • 22-August-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Under the garb of filing a review petition, a party cannot be permitted to repeat old and overruled arguments for reopening the conclusions arrived at in a judgment. Supreme Court.

  • 19-August-2022
  • Daksha Legal