• 

  Bar Council of India has no power to suspend practice of an Advocate ex-parte without affording an opportunity of being heard. Karnataka High Court.

  • 21-November-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Persons nominated under Section 352(1)(b) of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 are not eligible to be included in the electoral roll of the Local Authorities Constituency. Karnataka High Court.

  • 19-November-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Director of a company is not liable for prosecution under Section 138 of NI Act without the company being arraigned as an accused. Supreme Court reiterates.

  • 21-November-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Manufacture of polyurethane foam used for car seats cannot be considered as car seats/automobile seats for deduction under Section 80-IB of the IT Act. Supreme Court.

  • 21-November-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  While condoning enormous delay and enhancing compensation, statutory benefits and interest payable under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for the delayed period cannot be awarded. Supreme Court.

  • 21-November-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Suit for compensation against bank by purchaser for delivery of lesser extent of the property sold is not barred under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act. Supreme Court.

  • 19-November-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Before initiating criminal proceedings under the Factories Act, the authorities should pass an order on the reply submitted by the occupier or the factory manager to the show cause notice. Karnataka High Court.

  • 18-November-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Post-dated cheque presented beyond the period of three months from the date the cheque bears will not attract the provisions of Section 138 of the N I Act. Karnataka High Court.

  • 18-November-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  “Principle that the tiller of the land should be conferred occupancy rights is not applicable to the lands held by the Ex-serviceman”. Karnataka High Court orders restoration of tenanted lands to Soldier.

  • 22-November-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Court order blocking the social media impinges on the right of expression guaranteed under the Constitution. Court can only order removal of the objectional content on the social media. Karnataka High Court.

  • 18-November-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Wrong description of property in sale notice will not invalidate the sale under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 unless prejudice is caused to the borrower. Supreme Court.

  • 21-November-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Power of cancellation of bail cannot be approached as if of disciplinary proceedings against the accused. Supreme Court.

  • 17-November-2022
  • Daksha Legal