• 

  Female foeticide by polyclinics/diagnostic centres. Karnataka High Court directs Govt to notify Appropriate Authorities to register the crimes committed under the Preconception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994.

  • 08-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Standing Counsel of a statutory body cannot be booked for cheating for the adverse Court orders. Karnataka High Court admonishes the Registrar of RGUHS.

  • 07-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  ''Elections are the essence of democracy''. Karnataka High Court directs the Govt to provide reservation for women in the wards having greater women population and to hold elections at the earliest.

  • 10-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Merely because a client does not succeed in the matter and favourable orders were not passed in his favour, the client cannot make out a case that fraud and offence under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC has been committed by his Advocate. Karnataka High Court

  • 06-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Karnataka Land Grant Rules,1969. When temporary lease of land is confirmed upon expiry of the lease period and on payment of fixed price, the Deputy Commissioner cannot impose condition of non-alienation. Karnataka High Court.

  • 10-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Writ Court cannot direct the Government to frame scheme under Article 162 of the Constitution especially when the parties have alternative remedy for the redressal of their grievances. Karnataka High Court.

  • 07-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Advocate avoids execution of decree passed in 1966 by adopting unprofessional tactics. Karnataka High Court imposes cost of Rs. 5 lakhs, initiates contempt proceedings and refers the matter to Bar Council.

  • 04-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Invocation of SARFAESI is not a bar for Bank to initiate criminal action if account is declared fraud. Karnataka High Court.

  • 03-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  ‘Who decides Arbitrability?’. High Court must hold primary inquiry/review and prima facie come to conclusion on whether the dispute falls under the agreement and whether the dispute is arbitrable or not. Supreme Court.

  • 05-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Direction to give compassionate appointment after a period of 14/24 years will be against the object and purpose for which the appointment on compassionate ground is provided. Supreme Court, while reversing the High Court Judgment.

  • 03-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Can RBI issue directions to Banks to disclose customers information adversely affecting the individuals’ fundamental right to privacy? Supreme Court takes up the issue.

  • 04-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Avoid technicalities in payment of compensation to land losers. If two views are possible, the view that advances the cause of justice must be preferred. Supreme Court.

  • 06-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal