• 

  Accused is not entitled for default bail under Section 167 (2) Cr.P.C. in the event of charge sheet having already been filed before his arrest. Karnataka High Court.

  • 27-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Appointment of Vice Chancellor of University on the recommendation of Search Committee constituted contrary to UGC Regulations is void ab initio. State Act must be amended to bring it on a par with UGC Regulations. Supreme Court.

  • 27-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Mediclaim policy is contract of good faith. Repudiation of the claim on the ground of suppression of pre-existing illness cannot be found fault with. Karnataka High Court.

  • 22-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Cheque bounce case. Single complaint in respect of several cheques issued from Company account as well as personal account is maintainable if the transaction is same. Karnataka High Court.

  • 22-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Power of the Deputy Commissioner to demarcate Panchayat area also includes inclusion or exclusion of fishing lakes. Karnataka High Courts.

  • 24-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Only the Special Court and not the Magistrate can exercise powers under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Karnataka High Court.

  • 24-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Once it is established that the seized poppy straw tests positive for the contents of morphine and meconic acid, no other test would be necessary for bringing home the guilt of the accused under the provisions of Section 15 of the NDPS Act. Supreme Court.

  • 26-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Interpretation of statutes. Courts can look at the previous history of the statute, and the changes it underwent to discern what is intended by the lawmakers when an amendment is introduced, or a new law enacted. Supreme Court.

  • 25-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Cheque bounce case. Payment of interim compensation applies only in respect of offences committed after Section 143(A) of N.I.Act came into force in the statutory book. Karnataka High Court.

  • 20-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  If the predominant object of an educational institution is not profit, but advancement of general public utility, that some profits were earned would not debar it from claiming to be a charitable organization. Supreme Court.

  • 21-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Commercial Courts can deal with applications under Section 9, 14 and 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 though they are subordinate to Principal Civil Judge. Supreme Court.

  • 21-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Income Tax exemption to educational institutions. The institution must engage itself in education or educational activities, and not engage in any activity of profit. Such institutions cannot have objects which are unrelated to education. Supreme Court.

  • 21-October-2022
  • Daksha Legal