• 

  Application for permission to sue as an indigent person can be rejected if the allegations in the plaint do not show any cause of action or if the suit is barred by res judicata. Supreme Court.

  • 06-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When due to pendency of the land acquisition proceedings, the possession could not be taken over, the landowners cannot contend that the land acquisition proceedings have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Act, 2013. Supreme Court.

  • 06-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  A co-owner cannot seek temporary injunction against another co-owner on the ground of adverse possession unless there is a partition of the property by metes and bounds. Karnataka High Court.

  • 03-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  “The key feature of the policy is essentiality”. Karnataka High Court upholds Government of India policy imposing 30% trade margin on the manufacturer of essential drugs for combating cancer.

  • 03-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Sales officer does not fall within the definition of workman and hence cannot raise a dispute under the Industrial Dispute Act. Karnataka High Court.

  • 05-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  MVC Act. Insurance Company cannot escape its liability by merely branding driving license as fake without actually proving the same. Karnataka High Court.

  • 05-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Legal Metrology Act. Common complaint in respect of several distinct offences based on different causes of action on different facts and different nature is not maintainable. Karnataka High Court.

  • 03-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Dowry death. Failure to explain reasons within the knowledge of the accused, under Section 313 Cr.P.C, renders the defence of the accused unreliable. Karnataka High Court.

  • 03-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Proceedings under Section 138 N.I. Act cannot be initiated against a person who ceased to be director of a Company as on the date of issuance of the cheque. Karnataka High Court.

  • 05-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Kerala Promotion of Tree Growth in Non-Forest Areas Act. Only Divisional Forest Officer is competent to file final report under Section 9(3) of the Act. Kerala High Court.

  • 02-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Withdrawal of exemption under the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act on the ground of financial loss of an establishment for three consecutive years is not unconstitutional. Karnataka High Court.

  • 02-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Notification declaring the organisation to be unlawful with immediate effect contains sufficient reasons. Karnataka High Court rejects the challenge to the ban of Popular Front of India.

  • 02-December-2022
  • Daksha Legal