• 

  Police adding cognizable offence along with non-cognizable offence in FIR and later dropping cognizable offence from the chargesheet. The same will not cure mandatory requirement of Sanction under 155 (2) of Cr.P.C. Karnataka High Court.

  • 07-June-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Prosecution for the offence punishable under Section 505(2), IPC, ‘Statements creating or promoting enmity, hatred or ill-will between classes’ without prior sanction from the Government is illegal. Karnataka High Court

  • 05-June-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  State Electricity Regulation Commission has no power to regulate inter-State power transmission since it falls only within the domain of the Central Electricity Regulation Commission. Karnataka High Court.

  • 05-June-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Suit or proceeding in relation to the guardianship of the person or the custody of, or access to, any minor, can be filed only before the Family Court and the District Court has no jurisdiction. Karnataka High Court.

  • 05-June-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Conviction for the offence under Section 366A Procuration of minor girl for illicit sexual intercourse must be fortified by sufficient evidence and reasons when the offence of rape not proved. Karnataka High Court.

  • 03-June-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Electricity Act, 2003. Karnataka High Court directs e-filing, e-appearance and other e-services to be made available by all national tribunals within 6 months.

  • 05-June-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Copyright infringement. Merely because a civil dispute is being fought between the parties, the criminal proceedings cannot be halted, per se, on that ground. Karnataka High Court.

  • 03-June-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Suit seeking direction to conduct prayers/mass prayers in Church in a particular language invoking fundamental right under Article 25 does not involve Canon Law. Plaint cannot be rejected on this ground. Karnataka High Court.

  • 03-June-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Subsequent buyer of the property after issuance of the notification under Section 4 the 1894 Act has no locus to invoke Section 24(2) of the 2013 land acquisition Act. Supreme Court.

  • 02-June-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Karnataka SC/ST PTCL Act. Delay of 20 years in applying for cancellation of the sale. Such application cannot be entertained by the authorities. Karnataka High Court.

  • 02-June-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Revenue entries coupled with possession can be relied on in support of the plea of earlier oral/unregistered family arrangement. Karnataka High Court.

  • 02-June-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Pendency of civil case is not a ground to dismiss criminal proceeding. Criminal case regarding forgery of Will cannot be dismissed on the ground that the finding in criminal case will have a binding effect in pending civil suit. Karnataka High Court.

  • 02-June-2023
  • Daksha Legal