• 

  Mere pendency of litigation, in the absence of any restraint order, cannot be a ground for the Corporation not to enter the name of the purchaser in the khata. Karnataka High Court.

  • 20-September-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Injunction against co-owner could be granted only where acts of co-owner would diminish value and utility of property. Karnataka High Court.

  • 20-September-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  ''Gratuity is not a bounty that can be withheld at the sweet will or whim of the employer.'' Karnataka High Court condemns State action in withholding gratuity for 16 years. Awards interest and penalty.

  • 20-September-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Prior purchasers are necessary parties in a suit for specific performance by the subsequent agreement holder. Karnataka High Court.

  • 20-September-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Civic Amenity sites cannot be sold since they play a crucial role in shaping the quality of life within urban areas. Karnataka High Court.

  • 19-September-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Citizen adjudged innocent after a due trial cannot be subjected to fresh investigation or trial in Public Interest Litigation jurisdiction. Karnataka High Court.

  • 19-September-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Ownership and management of Temple built on Government Kharab land cannot be claimed by private persons especially when it is dedicated to the public. Karnataka High Court.

  • 19-September-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  ''It has become a habit to lay Sections 504 and 506, IPC in every offence merely because they are non-cognizable and the criminal cases are filed on glorified trivialities between husband and wife''. Karnataka High Court while quashing criminal proceeding

  • 19-September-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Against order of acquittal, State can file appeal only under Section 378(1) and (3) of Cr.P.C and not under Section 372 of Cr.P.C. Separation of remedy provision cannot be breached. Karnataka High Court.

  • 19-September-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Stay of suit under Section 10 CPC is permissible only if the whole subject-matter in both the proceedings is identical and not incidentally or collaterally in issue. Karnataka High Court.

  • 16-September-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Substantial question of law on which a second appeal shall be heard need not necessarily be a substantial question of law of general importance. As such, second appeal cannot be decided on equitable grounds. Kerala High Court.

  • 16-September-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Child on attaining majority can seek his/her name to be incorporated in the Birth Certificate. The Corporation cannot reject such plea on the ground of delay. Karnataka High Court.

  • 16-September-2023
  • Daksha Legal