• 

  Fraudulent transfer of Company shares. Company/officers of the company cannot plead lack of vicarious criminal liability at the investigation stage. Karnataka High Court.

  • 22-July-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Suit for partition dismissed for default does not bar a subsequent suit for partition since the right to enforce a partition is a continuous right. Karnataka High Court.

  • 21-July-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Suit for ejection. Once the defendants admit landlord-tenant relationship vis-à-vis the plaintiff, they cannot question title of the plaintiff over the tenanted property. Karnataka High Court.

  • 21-July-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Land acquisition. Value of casurina trees, eucalyptus tree and firewood trees cannot be excluded while determining the compensation payable for the land. Karnataka High Court.

  • 21-July-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When once the tenanted land is vested with the State Government under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, the same cannot be subsequently declared as Wakf property. Karnataka High Court.

  • 22-July-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  ’Withholding of evidence in defence would undoubtedly defeat the voyage towards discovery of truth in a criminal trial.’’. Karnataka High Court permits playing video footage in criminal trial as ‘previous statement’ on the day of the crime.

  • 21-July-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When party marks secondary evidence to establish the existence of primary evidence, there is no requirement of filing application under Section 65(c) of the Evidence Act. Karnataka High Court.

  • 26-June-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Karnataka Stamp Act. When a document required to be stamped for a lesser amount before the amendment, is produced before the Court, after the amendment, the Court cannot impound and levy higher/revised stamp duty. Karnataka High Court.

  • 26-June-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Land acquisition Act of 2013. There is no bar for the land-loser to make an application even after the period of thirty days for reference under Section 64. Karnataka High Court.

  • 25-June-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Once the plaintiff proves his possession and enjoyment of the suit property and when the defendant has chosen to contest the suit, the defendant’s interference could be inferred and the plaintiff is entitled for permanent injunction. Karnataka High Court.

  • 26-June-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Sub-Registrar cannot be prosecuted for registration of a bogus document. Karnataka High Court.

  • 26-June-2024
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Suit for partition without including all the joint family properties and without impleading all the co-sharers is not maintainable. Karnataka High Court.

  • 26-June-2024
  • Daksha Legal