• 

  KIADB cannot unilaterally cancel allotment of industrial plot for non-implementation of the project in time when the delay is attributable to reasons beyond the control of the allottee. Karnataka High Court.

  • 18-December-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  BBMP cannot insist on production of approved plan for the vacant site for the purpose of transfer of khata in the name of the purchaser. Karnataka High Court.

  • 16-December-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When the portion left in the layout plan for Ring Road, National Highway or Peripheral Road is not utilised for the said purpose and is diverted for other purpose, the landowner is entitled for TDR compensation. Karnataka High Court.

  • 16-December-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  When civil suit touching upon the constitution of the Managing Committee of the Trust is pending, petition under the Charitable and Religious Trusts Act, 1920 cannot be entertained. Karnataka High Court.

  • 15-December-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Karnataka Excise Act. Induction of wife of the deceased partner cannot be construed as creating new partnership or new entity for the purpose of issuance of licence. Karnataka High Court.

  • 15-December-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Land acquisition. Compensation determined in respect of one village can be applied in respect of lands situated in different village with same potentiality, same purpose and having same vicinity. Karnataka High Court.

  • 15-December-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Gram Panchayat can levy property tax on Industrial buildings situated in KIADB area only with effect from 25 February 2016. Karnataka High Court quashes demand notice for the earlier period.

  • 15-December-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Debt Recovery Tribunal has no power to direct surrender of passport of the borrower or the guarantor. Karnataka High Court.

  • 15-December-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Though criminal prosecution is permissible against defamatory statement in civil suit, if the statement is made in good faith and necessary for the disposal of the case, criminal prosecution cannot be allowed to continue. Karnataka High Court.

  • 14-December-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Prohibition against double allotment of shops under the APMC Act applies even when the trader ‘possesses’ another shop. Karnataka High Court.

  • 14-December-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  Karnataka Bank is not “State” within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India. Writ under Article 226 cannot be issued against the private bank. High court of Karnataka.

  • 14-December-2023
  • Daksha Legal
• 

  BBMP has no power to enquire into an allegation of encroachment simpliciter unless the encroachment is in violation of sanctioned plan. Karnataka High Court.

  • 14-December-2023
  • Daksha Legal