Log In
Contact Us
Sign Up
9980065416
Toggle navigation
HOME
BARE ACTS
JUDGMENTS
ARTICLES
NEWS
SEMINARS
LAWYERS DIRECTORY
Courts
ಕನ್ನಡ
Search
Sign Up
A dispute arising out of a Share Purchase Agreement does not amount to a commercial dispute under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. Such matters should be adjudicated by a regular civil court and not by a Commercial Court. Karnataka High Court.
07-February-2025
Daksha Legal
Judgement
Negotiable Instruments Act. A joint account holder who has not signed a cheque cannot be prosecuted under Section 138. Merely holding a joint account does not attract penal consequences. Karnataka High Court.
07-February-2025
Daksha Legal
Judgement
'Supreme Court curtailing the inherent powers of the High Courts. Neither Legal nor Justified'. - B.V.Acharya, former Advocate General for Karnataka.
07-November-2024
Daksha Legal
Article
News
07-February-2025
‘’Have faith in Karnataka Lokayukta’. The mere involvement of the Chief Minister is not sufficient ground for transferring an investigation in the absence of concrete evidence to show that Lokayukta officers were influenced by the Chief Minister. Karnataka High Court in MUDA case.
07-February-2025
The order depicts an ‘’inscrutable face of the sphinx’’. The Karnataka High Court quashes the order taking cognizance of the chargesheet against former CM, B.S. Yeddiyurappa for the offences under the POCSO Act, citing a lack of application of mind.
24-September-2024
‘’If this does not require investigation, I fail to understand what other case can merit investigation, as the beneficiary is the family of the petitioner and the benefit is by leaps and bounds, it is in fact a windfall’’. Karnataka High Court in CM Siddaramaiah case.
24-September-2024
“A common man would not have fought shy of facing such investigation. In the opinion of the Court, the Chief Minister, a leader of the proletariat, the bourgeois and of any citizen, should not fight shy of any investigation.” Karnataka High Court in CM Siddaramaiah case
PTCL Act. A claim for restitution of granted lands must be pursued within a reasonable time. Although the PTCL Act does not prescribe a limitation period, claims made after an unreasonably long delay are barred by the doctrine of laches. Karnataka High Court.
07-February-2025
Daksha Legal
Judgement
The right to claim arrears of maintenance is not completely extinguished by Section 125(3) Cr.P.C. Limitation of one year applies only to the mode of recovery through fine and imprisonment. Karnataka High Court.
07-February-2025
Daksha Legal
Judgement
Income Tax Act. A bonafide belief based on legal opinion from tax experts and legal professionals can constitute a reasonable cause under Section 273B, thereby exempting the assessee from penalty under Section 271C for non-deduction of TDS. Karnataka High Court.
07-February-2025
Daksha Legal
Judgement
Criminal law cannot be used to settle civil disputes when ownership and possession of the disputed land are already subject to adjudication in a civil court. Hence, criminal proceedings under Section 447 IPC (Criminal Trespass) cannot not be sustained. Karnataka High Court.
06-February-2025
Daksha Legal
Judgement
Anticipatory bail. Though Sessions Court and High Court have concurrent jurisdiction in entertaining and deciding a petition for bail, in the absence of exceptional circumstances, the accused must first approach the Sessions Court. Karnataka High Court.
06-February-2025
Daksha Legal
Judgement
A secured creditor cannot offer a property to the second-highest bidder through private negotiations if the highest bidder defaults. A fresh auction is mandatory under Rule 9(3) of SARFAESI Rules, 2002. Karnataka High Court.
06-February-2025
Daksha Legal
Judgement
Daksha Legal Seminars
Daksha Legal Seminar on Model Tenancy Act
03-October-2021 22:43
Panchanama - Evidentiary Value: Justice John Michael Cunha, Former Judge Karnataka High Court
15-July-2021 03:42
Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code
15-July-2021 03:40
Judgment on Basic Structure doctrine- Kenya High Court
15-July-2021 03:37
Trial of Suits for Declaration of Title, Injunction and Possession. S.R.Somashekar, Principal District Judge (Rtd)
30-May-2021 17:55
Trial of Partition Suits :Procedural Law (Part-I) Shri. S.R. Somashekara, Principal District Judge (Rtd) 28 May 2021
30-May-2021 04:27
Discussion on Junior Advocates and guidance by Seniors.
09-December-2020 06:19
Bail & Anticipatory Bail - M.S. Shyamsunder, Advocate, Bangalore
09-December-2020 06:20
Woman as Coparcener. Legal Implications - Justice N Kumar
09-December-2020 06:18
Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Anup Shah
09-December-2020 06:18
Instruments Not Duly Stamped - Justice A N Venugopalagowda
09-December-2020 06:18
Withdrawal and Adjustment of Suits - Justice A N Venugopalagowda
09-December-2020 06:18
Judicial Review jurisdiction Prayers and Reliefs Mr Mohan V Katarki Senior Advocate Supreme Court
09-December-2020 06:18
Rejection of Plaint Justice A N Venugopalagowda 16 Sept 2020
09-December-2020 06:18
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
09-December-2020 06:18
Driving License and Defence to Insurer - Mr S P Shankar Senior Advocate
09-December-2020 06:18
Termination of Contract & Drafting Termination Clause & Termination Notice - Ajay Nandalike. Adv.
09-December-2020 06:18
Daksha Legal Seminar Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri. "Civil Procedure Code. Order 26 Rule 9"
25-November-2020 06:12
Daksha Legal Online seminar on disability laws with Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, Bangalore.
25-November-2020 06:12
Article 370 - Bridge or Barricade? Seminar conducted by Daksha Legal - Mr. J Sai Deepak, Advocate
25-November-2020 06:12
Daksha Legal discussion on Latest Judgement of Karnataka High Court on Hindu Law.
25-November-2020 06:11
Tender. When the intending party responds to the tender notice, it is not permissible for such party to put forth its own conditions and seek variance in the conditions of tender. Karnataka High Court.
08-October-2024
Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Purchaser of suit property from the defendant/vendor is a necessary party to the suit and can be impleaded. Karnataka High Court.
03-October-2024
Daksha Legal
Article
Suit for specific performance. Plaintiff can seek amendment of pleading to declare that collusive decree between his vendor and third party is not binding on him. Court must prevent multiplicity of the proceedings. Karnataka High Court.
01-October-2024
Daksha Legal
Article
Tender. Courts cannot interfere with the terms of the tender because it feels that some other terms would have been fair, wiser or logical. Karnataka High Court.
30-September-2024
Daksha Legal
Article
Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque issued towards refund of advance sale consideration upon the failure to execute the sale deed, attracts the provisions of the Act. Karnataka High Court.
28-September-2024
Daksha Legal
Article
The opportunity of being heard should be more than just a formality, it must provide substantial compliance with natural justice. Karnataka High Court lays down guidelines for exercise of power under Section 223 (1) of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita.
27-September-2024
Daksha Legal
Article